On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 3:26 PM Dumitru Ceara wrote:
>
> On 3/23/21 8:15 PM, Han Zhou wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 5:00 AM Dumitru Ceara wrote:
> >>
> >> On 3/22/21 8:45 PM, Han Zhou wrote:
> >>> On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 4:27 AM Dumitru Ceara
wrote:
>
> On 3/19/21 6:55 PM, Han
When vlan-passthru is true for LS, for untagged localnet ports, tagged
VLAN traffic originating from VIFs should be passed through intact since
the VLAN header belongs to VIF user, not the localnet port fabric.
This patch adds multinode test cases to cover scenarios where packets
traverse through
On 3/23/21 6:55 PM, Dumitru Ceara wrote:
On 3/23/21 10:02 PM, Mark Michelson wrote:
On 3/23/21 12:13 PM, Dumitru Ceara wrote:
On 3/23/21 5:05 PM, Numan Siddique wrote:
On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 2:20 AM Mark Michelson
wrote:
Self-originated ARPs are intended to be sent to the "owning" router
On 3/23/21 10:02 PM, Mark Michelson wrote:
> On 3/23/21 12:13 PM, Dumitru Ceara wrote:
>> On 3/23/21 5:05 PM, Numan Siddique wrote:
>>> On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 2:20 AM Mark Michelson
>>> wrote:
Self-originated ARPs are intended to be sent to the "owning" router for
a given IP
On 3/23/21 8:15 PM, Han Zhou wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 5:00 AM Dumitru Ceara wrote:
>>
>> On 3/22/21 8:45 PM, Han Zhou wrote:
>>> On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 4:27 AM Dumitru Ceara wrote:
On 3/19/21 6:55 PM, Han Zhou wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 1:42 AM Dumitru Ceara
>
On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 5:23 PM Ben Pfaff wrote:
>
> On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 03:50:32PM +0100, Frode Nordahl wrote:
> > The devlink interface was introduced [0] in the Linux 4.6 time
> > frame and has since gained traction among multiple hardware
> > vendors.
> >
> > The devlink-port [1] and
Hi,
On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 04:43:07PM -0400, Aaron Conole wrote:
> When a user instructs a flow pipeline to perform connection tracking,
> there is an implicit L3 operation that occurs - namely the IP fragments
> are reassembled and then processed as a single unit. After this, new
> fragments
On 3/23/21 12:13 PM, Dumitru Ceara wrote:
On 3/23/21 5:05 PM, Numan Siddique wrote:
On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 2:20 AM Mark Michelson wrote:
Self-originated ARPs are intended to be sent to the "owning" router for
a given IP address, as well as flooded to non-router ports on a logical
switch.
On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 5:00 AM Dumitru Ceara wrote:
>
> On 3/22/21 8:45 PM, Han Zhou wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 4:27 AM Dumitru Ceara wrote:
> >>
> >> On 3/19/21 6:55 PM, Han Zhou wrote:
> >>> On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 1:42 AM Dumitru Ceara
wrote:
>
> On 3/19/21 2:41 AM, Han
On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 10:14:46AM +0100, Krzysztof Klimonda wrote:
> If there are snat entries on the router, and some logical_ip are set to
> network instead of an IP address then given SNAT is masquerade. In such
> case ct_snat action is used in lr_in_unsnat table to ensure that the
> packet is
On 3/22/21 7:44 PM, Numan Siddique wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 8:10 PM Dumitru Ceara wrote:
>>
>> On 3/19/21 1:05 PM, num...@ovn.org wrote:
>>> From: Numan Siddique
>>>
>>> When a port binding type changes from type 'A' to type 'B', then
>>> there are many code paths in the existing
On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 03:50:32PM +0100, Frode Nordahl wrote:
> The devlink interface was introduced [0] in the Linux 4.6 time
> frame and has since gained traction among multiple hardware
> vendors.
>
> The devlink-port [1] and devlink-info[1] interfaces are
> particularly useful for managing
On 3/23/21 5:05 PM, Numan Siddique wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 2:20 AM Mark Michelson wrote:
>>
>> Self-originated ARPs are intended to be sent to the "owning" router for
>> a given IP address, as well as flooded to non-router ports on a logical
>> switch.
>>
>> When trying to determine the
On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 2:20 AM Mark Michelson wrote:
>
> Self-originated ARPs are intended to be sent to the "owning" router for
> a given IP address, as well as flooded to non-router ports on a logical
> switch.
>
> When trying to determine the owning router for an IP address, we would
>
On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 2:20 AM Mark Michelson wrote:
>
> When a hairpin scenario is detected (i.e. egressing on gateway router
> port to a NAT external address), we loop back to the ingress router
> pipeline and swap the inport and outport. This is intended to allow for
> the traffic to get
From: Numan Siddique
When a port binding type changes from type 'A' to type 'B', then
there are many code paths in the existing binding.c which results
in crashes due to use-after-free or NULL references.
Below crashes are seen when a container lport is changed to a normal
lport and then
The devlink interface was introduced [0] in the Linux 4.6 time
frame and has since gained traction among multiple hardware
vendors.
The devlink-port [1] and devlink-info[1] interfaces are
particularly useful for managing NICs connected to multiple
distinct CPUs such as SmartNICs.
In such a
On 3/5/21 4:27 AM, Chris Mi wrote:
> Hi Ilya,
>
> I think about your suggestion recently. But I'm still not very clear about
> the design.
> Please see my reply below:
>
> On 3/1/2021 8:48 PM, Ilya Maximets wrote:
>> On 3/1/21 9:30 AM, Chris Mi wrote:
>>> Hi Simon, Ilya,
>>>
>>> Could I know
> -Original Message-
> From: Ilya Maximets
> Sent: Monday, March 22, 2021 12:55 PM
> To: Van Haaren, Harry ; Ilya Maximets
> ; ovs-dev@openvswitch.org
> Cc: Stokes, Ian ; Timothy Redaelli
> ; Flavio Leitner
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] dpif-netdev-lookup: Allow AVX512 dpcls without building
>
Ports of type 'localport' are present on every hypervisor and
ovn-controller is sending gARPs for them which makes upstream
switches to see its MAC address flapping.
In order to avoid this behavior, the current patch is skipping
localports when sending gARP/RARP packets.
Reported-at:
Paolo Valerio writes:
> Hi Aaron,
>
> Aaron Conole writes:
>
>> Recently, during some conntrack testing a bug was uncovered in a DPDK
>> PMD, which doesn't support an IPv4 packet with a zero checksum value.
>> In order to show that the connection tracking code in userspace
>> supports IPv4 UDP
On 3/22/21 8:45 PM, Han Zhou wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 4:27 AM Dumitru Ceara wrote:
>>
>> On 3/19/21 6:55 PM, Han Zhou wrote:
>>> On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 1:42 AM Dumitru Ceara wrote:
On 3/19/21 2:41 AM, Han Zhou wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 6:27 PM Han Zhou
On 22 Mar 2021, at 19:50, Paolo Valerio wrote:
Hi Eelco,
Thanks for working on this, very useful indeed.
not a full review, but I have a question about a minor thing.
Eelco Chaudron writes:
Currently, conntrack in the kernel has an undocumented feature
referred
to as NULL SNAT.
On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 8:47 PM Mark Michelson wrote:
>
> Hi Frode,
>
> For patches 6-9:
>
> Acked-by: Mark Michelson
Thank you for the review, much appreciated.
> Can you specify which of the patches need to be backported and to which
> branches they need to be backported? I can take care of
24 matches
Mail list logo
