Introduce skip_snat in load balancer option column in order to not
force_snat traffic that is hitting a given load balancer applied on a
logical router where lb_force_snat has been configured
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1927540
Tested-by: Andrew Stoycos
Signed-off-by: Lorenzo
> Hi Lorenzo,
>
> In general, this patch seems overly complicated based on the linked bug
> report.
Hi Mark,
thx for the review.
>
> The bug report wants to make the lb_force_snat_ip behavior to only be
> applied to certain load balancers, and not all load balancers on that
> router. To me,
On Fri, Apr 2, 2021 at 7:23 AM Dumitru Ceara wrote:
>
> On 3/24/21 3:40 PM, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote:
> > For allow ACLs, bypass connection tracking by avoiding setting ct
> > hints for matching traffic. Avoid sending all traffic to ct when a
> > stateful ACL is present. Before the patch, this
On 4/6/21 12:11 PM, Mark Gray wrote:
> I had a conversation with Dumitru and this patch came up in the
> conversation. He made an interesting suggestion (Dumitru, please correct
> me if I get this wrong) that this could be refactored as an external
> tool. This cmdline tool could, for example,
On Tue, Apr 06, 2021 at 02:53:34PM +0100, Mark Gray wrote:
> On 06/04/2021 13:59, Flavio Leitner wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 06, 2021 at 12:30:42PM +0100, Mark Gray wrote:
> >> On 05/04/2021 20:56, Flavio Leitner wrote:
> >>> On Thu, Apr 01, 2021 at 07:48:19PM +0100, Mark Gray wrote:
> On
On 06/04/2021 13:59, Flavio Leitner wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 06, 2021 at 12:30:42PM +0100, Mark Gray wrote:
>> On 05/04/2021 20:56, Flavio Leitner wrote:
>>> On Thu, Apr 01, 2021 at 07:48:19PM +0100, Mark Gray wrote:
On 01/04/2021 19:29, Ilya Maximets wrote:
> On 4/1/21 3:58 PM, Mark Gray
On Tue, Apr 06, 2021 at 12:30:42PM +0100, Mark Gray wrote:
> On 05/04/2021 20:56, Flavio Leitner wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 01, 2021 at 07:48:19PM +0100, Mark Gray wrote:
> >> On 01/04/2021 19:29, Ilya Maximets wrote:
> >>> On 4/1/21 3:58 PM, Mark Gray wrote:
> This series fixes IPv6 support for
On 01/04/2021 20:01, Ilya Maximets wrote:
> On 4/1/21 8:48 PM, Mark Gray wrote:
>> On 01/04/2021 19:29, Ilya Maximets wrote:
>>> On 4/1/21 3:58 PM, Mark Gray wrote:
This series fixes IPv6 support for Libreswan and introduces
IPsec system tests for Libreswan.
Mark Gray (5):
On 05/04/2021 20:56, Flavio Leitner wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 01, 2021 at 07:48:19PM +0100, Mark Gray wrote:
>> On 01/04/2021 19:29, Ilya Maximets wrote:
>>> On 4/1/21 3:58 PM, Mark Gray wrote:
This series fixes IPv6 support for Libreswan and introduces
IPsec system tests for Libreswan.
On 01/04/2021 13:28, gmingchen(陈供明) wrote:
> Correct some words
>
>
> On 2021/4/1, 8:17 PM, "gmingchen(陈供明)" wrote:
>
>
>
> On 2021/3/30, 4:59 PM, "Mark Gray" wrote:
>
> On 29/03/2021 13:30, gmingchen(陈供明) wrote:
> >
> > On 2021/3/25, 11:30 PM, "Mark Gray"
On Tue, Apr 06, 2021 at 10:54:32AM +0200, Eelco Chaudron wrote:
>
>
> On 6 Apr 2021, at 10:27, Martin Varghese wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Apr 01, 2021 at 11:32:06AM +0200, Eelco Chaudron wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On 1 Apr 2021, at 11:28, Martin Varghese wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Thu, Apr 01, 2021 at
Hi,
Thanks for the heads up. The interaction with MPLS push/pop is a use case that
was likely not tested during the NSH and generic encap/decap design. It's
complex code and a long time ago. I'm willing to help, but I will need some
time to go back and have a look.
It would definitely help,
On 6 Apr 2021, at 10:27, Martin Varghese wrote:
On Thu, Apr 01, 2021 at 11:32:06AM +0200, Eelco Chaudron wrote:
On 1 Apr 2021, at 11:28, Martin Varghese wrote:
On Thu, Apr 01, 2021 at 11:17:14AM +0200, Eelco Chaudron wrote:
On 1 Apr 2021, at 11:09, Martin Varghese wrote:
On Thu, Apr
agree, see an alternative fix (v2) in which I run the ovsdb-tool and
ovsdb-server under sudo as well
On Tue, Apr 6, 2021 at 12:15 AM Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 05, 2021 at 10:50:07PM +, hunchback wrote:
> > - $ mkdir -p /usr/local/etc/ovn
> > + $ sudo mkdir -m 777 -p
On Thu, Apr 01, 2021 at 11:32:06AM +0200, Eelco Chaudron wrote:
>
>
> On 1 Apr 2021, at 11:28, Martin Varghese wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Apr 01, 2021 at 11:17:14AM +0200, Eelco Chaudron wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On 1 Apr 2021, at 11:09, Martin Varghese wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Thu, Apr 01, 2021 at
On 1 Apr 2021, at 11:32, Eelco Chaudron wrote:
On 1 Apr 2021, at 11:28, Martin Varghese wrote:
On Thu, Apr 01, 2021 at 11:17:14AM +0200, Eelco Chaudron wrote:
On 1 Apr 2021, at 11:09, Martin Varghese wrote:
On Thu, Apr 01, 2021 at 10:54:42AM +0200, Eelco Chaudron wrote:
On 1 Apr
add documentation of install sequence sudo to support running install
sequence as non-root user
Signed-off-by: hunchback
---
Documentation/intro/install/general.rst | 14 +++---
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/intro/install/general.rst
On 4/6/2021 10:42 AM, Ivan Malov wrote:
External email: Use caution opening links or attachments
Hi Eli,
Thank you for improving the patch series gradually. May I clarify one
extra aspect (and I'm sorry if it has been discussed already): will OvS
always insert F1 first and then insert F2? I
Hi Eli,
Thank you for improving the patch series gradually. May I clarify one
extra aspect (and I'm sorry if it has been discussed already): will OvS
always insert F1 first and then insert F2? I mean, yes, in the model, F2
should process packets coming from F1, but is it *technically*
19 matches
Mail list logo
