On Wed, Aug 3, 2022 at 11:14 PM Numan Siddique wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 2, 2022 at 3:48 AM Ales Musil wrote:
> >
> > When someone creates or changes permission of the var/log
> > directory it stays that way. This can cause issues for logrotate
> > as it needs to have correct permission on
On Wed, Aug 3, 2022 at 9:55 AM Mohammad Heib wrote:
>
> Defining the matrix as a list will make it more readable
> and easy to extend also users can exclude and add new cases
> without using include, exclude just add a new combination
> to the list.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mohammad Heib
Thanks.
On Tue, Aug 2, 2022 at 3:48 AM Ales Musil wrote:
>
> When someone creates or changes permission of the var/log
> directory it stays that way. This can cause issues for logrotate
> as it needs to have correct permission on directory.
>
> Attempt to fix the permission every time we run
On Wed, Jul 27, 2022 at 3:12 AM Ales Musil wrote:
>
> The netcat compilation options differ between
> distributions, make the nc execution more
> robust. Now it does not fail on success message
> being printed to stderr.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ales Musil
Thanks. Applied to the main branch.
Numan
On Fri, Jul 1, 2022 at 6:53 AM Han Ding wrote:
>
>
> When the bridge protocols is not included Openflow10, printing an error
> message "version negotiation failed" when doing "Restoring saved flows".
>
> Signed-off-by: Han Ding
Looks good to me!
Acked-by: Mike Pattrick
> ---
>
'
On Tue, Jul 12, 2022 at 5:58 PM Ihar Hrachyshka wrote:
>
> When multiple chassis are fighting for the same port (requested-chassis
> is not set, e.g. for gateway ports), they may produce an unreasonable
> number of chassis field updates in a very short time frame (hundreds of
> updates in
On Mon, Jul 25, 2022 at 4:27 PM Mark Michelson wrote:
>
> Acked-by: Mark Michelson
The patch looks good to me. But it needs a rebase.
Numan
>
> On 7/12/22 17:57, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote:
> > This function will later be used to handle port binding updates for
> > postponed (throttled) bindings.
On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 11:43 AM Ilya Maximets wrote:
>
> SUMMARY: UndefinedBehaviorSanitizer: undefined-behavior in
> lib/dpif-netlink.c:1077:40: runtime error:
>left shift of 1 by 31 places cannot be represented in type 'int'
>
> #0 0x73fc31 in dpif_netlink_port_add_compat
On 8/3/22 17:19, Mike Pattrick wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 3, 2022 at 11:12 AM Ilya Maximets wrote:
>>
>> On 8/3/22 16:58, Mike Pattrick wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 2:27 PM Ilya Maximets wrote:
$NC_EOF_OPT should be used to avoid some netcat implementations
to wait indefinitely.
On Wed, Aug 3, 2022 at 11:12 AM Ilya Maximets wrote:
>
> On 8/3/22 16:58, Mike Pattrick wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 2:27 PM Ilya Maximets wrote:
> >>
> >> $NC_EOF_OPT should be used to avoid some netcat implementations
> >> to wait indefinitely.
> >>
> >> This fixes the check-offloads
On 8/3/22 16:58, Mike Pattrick wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 2:27 PM Ilya Maximets wrote:
>>
>> $NC_EOF_OPT should be used to avoid some netcat implementations
>> to wait indefinitely.
>>
>> This fixes the check-offloads testsuite hanging in Ubuntu 22.04.
>>
>> Fixes: 5660b89a309d
On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 2:27 PM Ilya Maximets wrote:
>
> $NC_EOF_OPT should be used to avoid some netcat implementations
> to wait indefinitely.
>
> This fixes the check-offloads testsuite hanging in Ubuntu 22.04.
>
> Fixes: 5660b89a309d ("dpif-netlink: Offloading meter to tc police action")
>
Some CMSes, like ovn-kubernetes, tend to create load balancers attached
to a big number of logical switches or routers. For each of these
load balancers northd creates a record in Load_Balancer table of the
Southbound database with all the logical datapaths (switches, routers)
listed in the
Bleep bloop. Greetings Mohammad Heib, I am a robot and I have tried out your
patch.
Thanks for your contribution.
I encountered some error that I wasn't expecting. See the details below.
git-am:
error: sha1 information is lacking or useless (controller/binding.c).
error: could not build fake
The local_datapath->peer_ports list contains peers pointers
to lsp<-->lrp ports that are supposed to be router end ports,
those pointers are added and deleted to the local_datapath->peer_ports
when logical switch port of type router are added or deleted from the database.
The deletion and
The local_datapath->peer_ports list contains peers pointers
to lsp<-->lrp ports that are supposed to be router end ports,
those pointers are added and deleted to the local_datapath->peer_ports
when logical switch port of type router are added or deleted from the database.
The deletion and
Defining the matrix as a list will make it more readable
and easy to extend also users can exclude and add new cases
without using include, exclude just add a new combination
to the list.
Signed-off-by: Mohammad Heib
---
.github/workflows/test.yml | 55 ++
1
Hi Vasu & Eelco,
Pls review my patch.
Thanks a lot.
> -Original Message-
> From: lin huang
> Sent: Friday, July 29, 2022 7:17 PM
> To: ovs-dev@openvswitch.org; echau...@redhat.com; i.maxim...@ovn.org;
> vdas...@gmail.com
> Cc: Lin Huang ; Zhang Yuhuang
>
> Subject: [PATCH]
Ilya Maximets writes:
> On 7/19/22 08:59, Michael Santana wrote:
>> The handler and CPU mapping in upcalls are incorrect, and this is
>> specially noticeable systems with cpu isolation enabled.
>>
>> Say we have a 12 core system where only every even number CPU is enabled
>> C0, C2, C4, C6, C8,
The preprocessor comparison string to check AVX512 capabilities are
lengthy and effecting user readability. Simpify this by aliasing the checks.
Suggested-by: Eelco Chaudron
Signed-off-by: Sunil Pai G
Acked-by: Cian Ferriter
---
lib/dpif-netdev-lookup.c | 6 --
On Wed, Aug 03, 2022 at 01:33:21PM +0300, Vlad Buslov wrote:
...
> Thanks for the review! I've just sent V3 that sets action type based on
> target classifier instead of policer BPS/PPS.
Likewise, thanks.
We'll review v3.
___
dev mailing list
> >
> >
> Sending a friendly ping here to check for any comments/objections
> on
> >> this patch from maintainers.
> >>>
> >>> Hi, Sunil. I think, Ian wanted to apply the patch, we discussed
> >>> that on a meeting last week.
> >>
> >> It's probably just a PTO season. :)
> >> (Got a
On 8/3/22 13:50, Pai G, Sunil wrote:
>
>
>
Sending a friendly ping here to check for any comments/objections on
>> this patch from maintainers.
>>>
>>> Hi, Sunil. I think, Ian wanted to apply the patch, we discussed that
>>> on a meeting last week.
>>
>> It's probably just a PTO season.
On 8/3/22 13:44, Ilya Maximets wrote:
> On 8/3/22 12:39, Dumitru Ceara wrote:
>> Starting with flake8>=5.0.1 we got the following report:
>> tests/check_acl_log.py:94:80: E501 line too long (80 > 79 characters)
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Dumitru Ceara
>> ---
>> tests/check_acl_log.py | 3 ++-
>> 1
> >> Sending a friendly ping here to check for any comments/objections on
> this patch from maintainers.
> >
> > Hi, Sunil. I think, Ian wanted to apply the patch, we discussed that
> > on a meeting last week.
>
> It's probably just a PTO season. :)
> (Got a few OOO replies here)
Thanks Ilya
On 8/3/22 12:39, Dumitru Ceara wrote:
> Starting with flake8>=5.0.1 we got the following report:
> tests/check_acl_log.py:94:80: E501 line too long (80 > 79 characters)
>
> Signed-off-by: Dumitru Ceara
> ---
> tests/check_acl_log.py | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
Reported-at: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2077306
Signed-off-by: Dumitru Ceara
---
northd/northd.c | 2 +-
northd/ovn-northd.8.xml | 4 ++--
tests/ovn.at| 42 ++---
3 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff
Starting with flake8>=5.0.1 we got the following report:
tests/check_acl_log.py:94:80: E501 line too long (80 > 79 characters)
Signed-off-by: Dumitru Ceara
---
tests/check_acl_log.py | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tests/check_acl_log.py
On Tue 02 Aug 2022 at 14:01, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 02, 2022 at 10:38:03AM +0300, Vlad Buslov wrote:
>> On Wed 27 Jul 2022 at 11:49, Vlad Buslov wrote:
>> > On Wed 27 Jul 2022 at 10:26, Simon Horman
>> > wrote:
>> >> On Tue, Jul 26, 2022 at 07:52:31AM -0500, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
Referenced commit changed policer action type from TC_ACT_UNSPEC (continue)
to TC_ACT_PIPE. However, since neither TC hardware offload layer nor mlx5
driver at the time validated action type and always assumed 'continue', the
breakage wasn't caught until later validation code was added. The change
Packets that could not be transmitted because the TXQ are full should be
taken into account in the global ovs_tx_failure_drops as it was the case
before commit 29b94e12d57d ("netdev-dpdk: Refactor the DPDK transmit
path.").
Also, the global tx_dropped should take all ovs_*_tx_drops counters into
31 matches
Mail list logo
