Hi Dumitru,
I just wanted to ask wether you need any help (maybe, testing) in this?
I’m ready to check this on my dataset if you were successful to implement a fix.
> On 12 Jul 2023, at 12:15, Dumitru Ceara wrote:
>
> On 7/12/23 00:01, Ilya Maximets wrote:
>> On 7/11/23 19:01, Dumitru Ceara
Bleep bloop. Greetings Felix Huettner, I am a robot and I have tried out your
patch.
Thanks for your contribution.
I encountered some error that I wasn't expecting. See the details below.
checkpatch:
WARNING: Line lacks whitespace around operator
WARNING: Line lacks whitespace around
ovn supports creating remote logical ports. An user
can set requested-chassis option for a logical switch port
to the remote chassis and ovn-northd can bind it to that chassis.
This is required for OVN IC in ovn-k8s. Right now ovn-k8s
ovnkube-controller after creating a remote logical port, sets
the arguments for the interconnect database where missing.
Signed-off-by: Felix Huettner
---
ic/ovn-ic.c | 7 ++-
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/ic/ovn-ic.c b/ic/ovn-ic.c
index 6f31037ec..db7e86bc1 100644
--- a/ic/ovn-ic.c
+++ b/ic/ovn-ic.c
@@ -106,11 +106,16
Adrian Moreno writes:
> Use drop reasons from include/net/dropreason-core.h when a reasonable
> candidate exists.
>
> Signed-off-by: Adrian Moreno
> ---
> net/openvswitch/actions.c | 17 ++---
> net/openvswitch/conntrack.c | 3 ++-
> net/openvswitch/drop.h | 6 ++
> 3
Adrian Moreno writes:
> Make ovs-dpctl.py support explicit drops as:
> "drop" -> implicit empty-action drop
> "drop(0)" -> explicit non-error action drop
> "drop(42)" -> explicit error action drop
>
> Signed-off-by: Adrian Moreno
> ---
> .../selftests/net/openvswitch/openvswitch.sh | 25
Adrian Moreno writes:
> From: Eric Garver
>
> This adds an explicit drop action. This is used by OVS to drop packets
> for which it cannot determine what to do. An explicit action in the
> kernel allows passing the reason _why_ the packet is being dropped or
> zero to indicate no particular
Adrian Moreno writes:
> There is currently a gap in drop visibility in the openvswitch module.
> This series tries to improve this by adding a new drop reason subsystem
> for OVS.
>
> Apart from adding a new drop reasson subsystem and some common drop
> reasons, this series takes Eric's
About the second change,
A large part of ip protocols do not need the checksum recalculation of themself.
There are only 6 protocols in tc csum action except for the ip header.
If a protocol need the recalculation of the checksum, may be it should add the
special handling in TC,
because each has
