On Mon, Apr 22, 2024 at 11:37 AM Hyunwoo Kim wrote:
>
> Since kfree_rcu, which is called in the hlist_for_each_entry_rcu traversal
> of ovs_ct_limit_exit, is not part of the RCU read critical section, it
> is possible that the RCU grace period will pass during the traversal and
> the key will be
On Tue, Feb 6, 2024 at 3:55 PM Aaron Conole wrote:
>
>
> Oops - I didn't consider it.
>
> Given that, maybe the best approach would not to rely on per-cpu
> counter. I'll respin in the next series with a depth counter that I pass
> to the function instead and compare that. I guess that should
On Tue, Feb 6, 2024 at 2:11 PM Aaron Conole wrote:
>
> The ovs module allows for some actions to recursively contain an action
> list for complex scenarios, such as sampling, checking lengths, etc.
> When these actions are copied into the internal flow table, they are
> evaluated to validate that
On Thu, Sep 21, 2023 at 9:42 PM Ilya Maximets wrote:
>
> do_execute_actions() function can be called recursively multiple
> times while executing actions that require pipeline forking or
> recirculations. It may also be re-entered multiple times if the packet
> leaves openvswitch module and
On Thu, Sep 21, 2023 at 9:03 PM Ilya Maximets wrote:
>
> do_execute_actions() function can be called recursively multiple
> times while executing actions that require pipeline forking or
> recirculations. It may also be re-entered multiple times if the packet
> leaves openvswitch module and
On Wed, Apr 5, 2023 at 9:53 AM Felix Huettner
wrote:
>
> assume the following setup on a single machine:
> 1. An openvswitch instance with one bridge and default flows
> 2. two network namespaces "server" and "client"
> 3. two ovs interfaces "server" and "client" on the bridge
> 4. for each ovs
On Tue, Apr 4, 2023 at 9:33 AM Felix Huettner
wrote:
>
> assume the following setup on a single machine:
> 1. An openvswitch instance with one bridge and default flows
> 2. two network namespaces "server" and "client"
> 3. two ovs interfaces "server" and "client" on the bridge
> 4. for each ovs
On Wed, Jun 22, 2022 at 9:04 PM Eric Dumazet wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 22, 2022 at 8:19 PM Ilya Maximets wrote:
> >
> > On 6/22/22 19:03, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jun 22, 2022 at 6:47 PM Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > >>
> > >> On Wed, Jun 22, 2022 at 6:39 PM Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>
On Wed, Jun 22, 2022 at 8:19 PM Ilya Maximets wrote:
>
> On 6/22/22 19:03, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 22, 2022 at 6:47 PM Eric Dumazet wrote:
> >>
> >> On Wed, Jun 22, 2022 at 6:39 PM Eric Dumazet wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On Wed, Jun 22, 2022 at 6:29 PM Eric Dumazet wrote:
>
> On
On Wed, Jun 22, 2022 at 6:47 PM Eric Dumazet wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 22, 2022 at 6:39 PM Eric Dumazet wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Jun 22, 2022 at 6:29 PM Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jun 22, 2022 at 4:26 PM Ilya Maximets wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On 6/22/22 13:43, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > >
>
On Wed, Jun 22, 2022 at 6:39 PM Eric Dumazet wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 22, 2022 at 6:29 PM Eric Dumazet wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Jun 22, 2022 at 4:26 PM Ilya Maximets wrote:
> > >
> > > On 6/22/22 13:43, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > I tested the patch below and it seems to fix the issue seen
On Wed, Jun 22, 2022 at 6:29 PM Eric Dumazet wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 22, 2022 at 4:26 PM Ilya Maximets wrote:
> >
> > On 6/22/22 13:43, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>
> >
> > I tested the patch below and it seems to fix the issue seen
> > with OVS testsuite. Though it's not obvious for me why this
> >
On Wed, Jun 22, 2022 at 4:26 PM Ilya Maximets wrote:
>
> On 6/22/22 13:43, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>
> I tested the patch below and it seems to fix the issue seen
> with OVS testsuite. Though it's not obvious for me why this
> happens. Can you explain a bit more?
Anyway, I am not sure we can call
On Wed, Jun 22, 2022 at 4:26 PM Ilya Maximets wrote:
>
> On 6/22/22 13:43, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 22, 2022 at 1:32 PM Ilya Maximets wrote:
> >>
> >> On 6/22/22 12:36, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> >>> On Wed, Jun 22, 2022 at 12:28 PM Florian Westphal wrote:
>
> Eric Dumazet
On Wed, Jun 22, 2022 at 1:32 PM Ilya Maximets wrote:
>
> On 6/22/22 12:36, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 22, 2022 at 12:28 PM Florian Westphal wrote:
> >>
> >> Eric Dumazet wrote:
> >>> On Sun, Jun 19, 2022 at 2:39 AM Ilya Maximets wrote:
>
> Open vSwitch system test suite is
On Wed, Jun 22, 2022 at 12:28 PM Florian Westphal wrote:
>
> Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > On Sun, Jun 19, 2022 at 2:39 AM Ilya Maximets wrote:
> > >
> > > Open vSwitch system test suite is broken due to inability to
> > > load/unload netfilter modules. kworker thread is getting trapped
> > > in the
On Wed, Jun 22, 2022 at 12:02 PM Eric Dumazet wrote:
>
> On Sun, Jun 19, 2022 at 2:39 AM Ilya Maximets wrote:
> >
> > Open vSwitch system test suite is broken due to inability to
> > load/unload netfilter modules. kworker thread is getting trapped
> > in the infinite loop while running a net
On Sun, Jun 19, 2022 at 2:39 AM Ilya Maximets wrote:
>
> Open vSwitch system test suite is broken due to inability to
> load/unload netfilter modules. kworker thread is getting trapped
> in the infinite loop while running a net cleanup inside the
> nf_conntrack_cleanup_net_list, because deferred
On Thu, Jun 9, 2022 at 4:50 AM Paolo Abeni wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2022-06-08 at 16:00 -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 8, 2022 at 3:58 PM David Ahern wrote:
> > >
> > > On 6/8/22 8:58 AM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > > > IMO to encourage use of the track-capable API we could keep their names
On Wed, Jun 8, 2022 at 3:58 PM David Ahern wrote:
>
> On 6/8/22 8:58 AM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > IMO to encourage use of the track-capable API we could keep their names
> > short and call the legacy functions __netdev_hold() as I mentioned or
> > maybe netdev_hold_notrack().
>
> I like that
20 matches
Mail list logo
