On 24/06/2021 05:51, Jesse Gross wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 10:06 AM Ben Pfaff <mailto:b...@ovn.org>> wrote:
>
> [updating Jesse's email address]
>
> On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 04:48:29PM +0200, Matthias May via dev wrote:
> > I'm currently figh
On 23/06/2021 19:06, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> [updating Jesse's email address]
>
> On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 04:48:29PM +0200, Matthias May via dev wrote:
>> I'm currently fighting with issues where TCP/UDP frames that are larger than
>> the MTU of a GRE tunnel are dropped.
>
Hi Jesse, Hi List
I'm currently fighting with issues where TCP/UDP frames that are larger than
the MTU of a GRE tunnel are dropped.
I'm aware of the whys and how to work around the issue, but while looking for
solutions i stumbled over the fact that:
* [1] added PMTUD support to OVS
* [2]
On 03/11/2020 18:13, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 10:56:02AM +0100, Matthias May via dev wrote:
>> I'm looking for a way to replicate the behaviour of a standard bridge.
>> In a standard bridge when all members of the bridge report their
>> operstate as do
Hi List
I'm looking for a way to replicate the behaviour of a standard bridge.
In a standard bridge when all members of the bridge report their
operstate as down, the bridge itself reports its operstate down as well.
Is there any way to achieve this?
Thank you.
BR
Matthias
On 03/07/2020 09:20, Pratik Panjwani wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I am trying to extend my L2 network across sites using wireguard as my VPN.
> The networking internally across VMs in a site is managed using
> openvswitch. I have established the connectivity between the WG Client and
> WG server(tunnel
On 23/02/2019 00:12, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 12:16:14AM +0100, Matthias May via dev wrote:
>> There are switches which allow to transmit their BPDUs VLAN-tagged.
>> With this change OVS is able to receive VLAN-tagged BPDUs, but still
>> transmits i
On 15/02/2019 01:28, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 12:27:11AM +0100, Matthias May wrote:
>> On 14/02/2019 20:17, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>>> On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 10:58:48AM +0100, Matthias May via dev wrote:
>>>> There are switches which allow to tr
On 14/02/2019 16:51, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 03:14:26PM +0100, Matthias May wrote:
>> On 14/02/2019 14:34, Flavio Leitner wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Ben,
>>>
>>> This is another patch with From: field altered to be
>>> ovs-dev@openv
On 14/02/2019 20:17, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 10:58:48AM +0100, Matthias May via dev wrote:
>> There are switches which allow to transmit their BPDUs VLAN-tagged.
>> With this change OVS is able to receive VLAN-tagged BPDUs, but still
>> transmits i
There are switches which allow to transmit their BPDUs VLAN-tagged.
With this change OVS is able to receive VLAN-tagged BPDUs, but still
transmits its own BPDUs untagged.
This was tested against Westermo RFI-207-F4G-T3G.
v2: Send patch to different address of mailing list according to suggestion
On 14/02/2019 14:34, Flavio Leitner wrote:
>
> Hi Ben,
>
> This is another patch with From: field altered to be
> ovs-dev@openvswitch.org.
>
> [...]
> From: Matthias May via dev
> Reply-To: Matthias May
>
> If the patch gets applied as is, the commit's A
On 14/02/2019 14:34, Flavio Leitner wrote:
>
> Hi Ben,
>
> This is another patch with From: field altered to be
> ovs-dev@openvswitch.org.
>
> [...]
> From: Matthias May via dev
> Reply-To: Matthias May
>
> If the patch gets applied as is, the commit's A
On 14/02/2019 11:59, 0-day Robot wrote:
> Bleep bloop. Greetings Matthias May via dev, I am a robot and I have tried
> out your patch.
> Thanks for your contribution.
>
> I encountered some error that I wasn't expecting. See the details below.
>
>
> checkpatch
There are switches which allow to transmit their BPDUs VLAN-tagged.
With this change OVS is able to receive VLAN-tagged BPDUs, but still
transmits its own BPDUs untagged.
This was tested against Westermo RFI-207-F4G-T3G.
Signed-off-by: Matthias May
---
ofproto/ofproto-dpif-xlate.c | 7 ++-
15 matches
Mail list logo
