Re: [ovs-dev] Bug#974588: Bug#974588: openvswitch: DPDK 20.11 support and transition for bullseye

2021-01-07 Thread Thomas Goirand
pha / beta) tag. Cheers, Thomas Goirand (zigo) ___ dev mailing list d...@openvswitch.org https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev

Re: [ovs-dev] Bug#974588: openvswitch: DPDK 20.11 support and transition for bullseye

2020-11-13 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 11/13/20 6:54 PM, Ilya Maximets wrote: > On 11/13/20 1:47 PM, Thomas Goirand wrote: >> On 11/12/20 5:09 PM, Luca Boccassi wrote: >>> Source: openvswitch >>> Version: 2.13.0+dfsg1-12 >>> Severity: normal >>> X-Debbugs-CC: pkg-dpdk-de...

Re: [ovs-dev] Bug#974588: openvswitch: DPDK 20.11 support and transition for bullseye

2020-11-13 Thread Thomas Goirand
to happen again. Please get the release team in the loop, therefore, and make them pre-approve such a plan, by opening a bug with them. Also, I would very much like to have OVS and OVN being packaged and maintained on both Ubuntu and Debian the same way. I would very

[ovs-dev] NDP for ipv6 in OVS 2.10.0

2019-09-10 Thread Thomas Goirand
Hi Ben and others, I just want to know: does OVS 2.10 has support for IPv6 mac learning / NDP, so that we can avoid the ipv6 broadcast storm in our cloud? Cheers, Thomas Goirand (zigo) P.S: I'm not registered to this list, please CC me. ___ dev

Re: [ovs-dev] Open vSwitch Debian package maintainership

2018-06-18 Thread Thomas Goirand
it. The only way I could do it would be cheating by reading what has been done in Ubuntu. That's not the way I want to continue doing the work. I don't really get what is the difference between OVS and OVN as well. So, definitively, please continue to help! Cheers, Thomas Goirand (zigo) ___

[ovs-dev] failed to build in some Debian arch

2017-11-16 Thread Thomas Goirand
ried to build the tip of the 2.8 branch in a Debian porter box, and these tests are failing as well. 2 RC bugs were reported in Debian: https://bugs.debian.org/880508 https://bugs.debian.org/880509 Could someone have a look and help me fix these bugs? Cheers, Thomas Goirand (

Re: [ovs-dev] [PKG-Openstack-devel] Bug#878249: Bug#878249: recent OVS upload

2017-11-01 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 11/01/2017 02:58 AM, Thomas Goirand wrote: > Ben, could you investigate? I've uploaded to Unstable a version with the > patch above, because it's the last blocker to have the last OpenStack > dependency approved in the NEW queue. Let me know if you think we need > to work more on

Re: [ovs-dev] [PKG-Openstack-devel] Bug#878249: recent OVS upload

2017-10-31 Thread Thomas Goirand
; > There's now a failure on hppa, too, which bears investigation. I'll try > to look at that soon. Ben, could you investigate? I've uploaded to Unstable a version with the patch above, because it's the last blocker to have the last OpenStack dependency approved in the NEW queue. Let me

Re: [ovs-dev] [PKG-Openstack-devel] Bug#878249: recent OVS upload

2017-10-26 Thread Thomas Goirand
ackages that were not technically needed, because that's best practice in Debian (ie: the FTP masters recommend this). All of them have a Provides: equivalent. This also simplifies packaging a lot (ie: all /usr/bin things and manpages are going into openvswitch-common, etc.). BTW, I always want

[ovs-dev] Bug#878249: Please package >= 2.7.0

2017-10-20 Thread Thomas Goirand
for you? I'm starting... Cheers, Thomas Goirand (zigo) ___ dev mailing list d...@openvswitch.org https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev

[ovs-dev] Bug#878249: Please package >= 2.7.0

2017-10-11 Thread Thomas Goirand
Package: python-openvswitch Severity: wishlist Hi Ben (and others?), OpenStack Pike needs ovs >= 2.7.0. We're about to release it to Debian unstable, as it is currently staging in Experimental. Please package this ASAP. Cheers, Thomas Goirand (z