> > Cc: "ovs dev" <d...@openvswitch.org>
> > Sent: Tuesday, March 14, 2017 11:21:33 AM
> > Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH] ovn-northd: Skip icmp4 packets destined
> for router ports from conntrack
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 12:57 AM, Russell
- Original Message -
> From: "Numan Siddique" <nusid...@redhat.com>
> To: "Russell Bryant" <russ...@ovn.org>
> Cc: "ovs dev" <d...@openvswitch.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, March 14, 2017 11:21:33 AM
> Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] [PAT
On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 12:57 AM, Russell Bryant wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 4:48 PM, Russell Bryant wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 2:35 PM, Russell Bryant wrote:
> >> On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 11:52 PM, Numan Siddique
On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 4:48 PM, Russell Bryant wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 2:35 PM, Russell Bryant wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 11:52 PM, Numan Siddique wrote:
>> I don't think it's a Neutron issue.
>>
>> I see the conntrack entry
On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 2:35 PM, Russell Bryant wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 11:52 PM, Numan Siddique wrote:
>> Thanks for the review. Please see inline.
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 1:44 AM, Russell Bryant wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mon, Feb
On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 11:52 PM, Numan Siddique wrote:
> Thanks for the review. Please see inline.
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 1:44 AM, Russell Bryant wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 12:59 AM, wrote:
>> > From: Numan Siddique
On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 10:22 AM, Numan Siddique
wrote:
> Thanks for the review. Please see inline.
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 1:44 AM, Russell Bryant wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 12:59 AM, wrote:
>> > From: Numan Siddique
Thanks for the review. Please see inline.
On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 1:44 AM, Russell Bryant wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 12:59 AM, wrote:
> > From: Numan Siddique
> >
> > Presently, the icmp4 requests to the router gateway ip are
On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 12:59 AM, wrote:
> From: Numan Siddique
>
> Presently, the icmp4 requests to the router gateway ip are sent to the
> connectiont tracker, but the icmp4 reply packets responded by
> 'lr_in_ip_input' stage are not sent to the
Thanks for the review and comments.
On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 10:00 AM, Darrell Ball wrote:
> Daniele and I discussed
>
> 1) Seems ok in that there is security at the VM LP so weakening the
> Check at the router port for ICMP seems ok.
> 2) The same applies to V6 ?
>
I need to
I'm also looking at this one. I was trying to review today, but have
been slowed down by getting an OpenStack test environment working for
testing this and looking closer.
On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 4:32 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> Hi Darrell and Daniele, do one of you have an opinion on
Hi Darrell and Daniele, do one of you have an opinion on whether this is
the right approach?
Thanks,
Ben.
On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 11:29:14AM +0530, nusid...@redhat.com wrote:
> From: Numan Siddique
>
> Presently, the icmp4 requests to the router gateway ip are sent to the
From: Numan Siddique
Presently, the icmp4 requests to the router gateway ip are sent to the
connectiont tracker, but the icmp4 reply packets responded by
'lr_in_ip_input' stage are not sent to the connection tracker.
Also no zone ids are assigned for the router ports.
13 matches
Mail list logo