On 22 Jan 2024, at 21:51, Ilya Maximets wrote:
> On 1/19/24 14:01, Eelco Chaudron wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 19 Jan 2024, at 13:53, David Marchand wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, Jan 19, 2024 at 1:49 PM Ilya Maximets wrote:
On 1/18/24 14:00, David Marchand wrote:
> Seen in GHA recently.
> Unit
On 1/19/24 14:01, Eelco Chaudron wrote:
>
>
> On 19 Jan 2024, at 13:53, David Marchand wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Jan 19, 2024 at 1:49 PM Ilya Maximets wrote:
>>>
>>> On 1/18/24 14:00, David Marchand wrote:
Seen in GHA recently.
Unit tests are checking conntracks relating to a destination ip
On Fri, Jan 19, 2024 at 01:40:03PM +0100, David Marchand wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 19, 2024 at 1:20 PM Simon Horman wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Jan 18, 2024 at 02:00:18PM +0100, David Marchand wrote:
> > > Seen in GHA recently.
> > > Unit tests are checking conntracks relating to a destination ip address
>
On 19 Jan 2024, at 13:53, David Marchand wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 19, 2024 at 1:49 PM Ilya Maximets wrote:
>>
>> On 1/18/24 14:00, David Marchand wrote:
>>> Seen in GHA recently.
>>> Unit tests are checking conntracks relating to a destination ip address
>>> but the FORMAT_CT macro is not strict en
On 19 Jan 2024, at 13:49, Ilya Maximets wrote:
> On 1/18/24 14:00, David Marchand wrote:
>> Seen in GHA recently.
>> Unit tests are checking conntracks relating to a destination ip address
>> but the FORMAT_CT macro is not strict enough and would match unrelated
>> conntracks too.
>>
>> Example
On Fri, Jan 19, 2024 at 1:49 PM Ilya Maximets wrote:
>
> On 1/18/24 14:00, David Marchand wrote:
> > Seen in GHA recently.
> > Unit tests are checking conntracks relating to a destination ip address
> > but the FORMAT_CT macro is not strict enough and would match unrelated
> > conntracks too.
> >
On 1/18/24 14:00, David Marchand wrote:
> Seen in GHA recently.
> Unit tests are checking conntracks relating to a destination ip address
> but the FORMAT_CT macro is not strict enough and would match unrelated
> conntracks too.
>
> Example:
> 148. system-traffic.at:6432: testing conntrack - DNAT
On Fri, Jan 19, 2024 at 1:20 PM Simon Horman wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jan 18, 2024 at 02:00:18PM +0100, David Marchand wrote:
> > Seen in GHA recently.
> > Unit tests are checking conntracks relating to a destination ip address
> > but the FORMAT_CT macro is not strict enough and would match unrelated
>
On Thu, Jan 18, 2024 at 02:00:18PM +0100, David Marchand wrote:
> Seen in GHA recently.
> Unit tests are checking conntracks relating to a destination ip address
> but the FORMAT_CT macro is not strict enough and would match unrelated
> conntracks too.
>
> Example:
> 148. system-traffic.at:6432: t
Seen in GHA recently.
Unit tests are checking conntracks relating to a destination ip address
but the FORMAT_CT macro is not strict enough and would match unrelated
conntracks too.
Example:
148. system-traffic.at:6432: testing conntrack - DNAT with
additional SNAT ...
[...]
./system-traffi
10 matches
Mail list logo