Thanks for all the responses! I'll comment on a few:
On Mon, Oct 01, 2018 at 06:26:05PM +0200, Lorenzo Bianconi wrote:
> On Sep 26, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> > A 30-second timeout seems long to me. After that long, the sender will
> > have retransmitted the packet, probably multiple times. I wasn't
On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 03:07:52PM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 05:19:24PM +0200, Lorenzo Bianconi wrote:
> > Add buffering support for IPv4 packets that will be processed
> > by arp {} action when L2 address is not discovered yet since
> > otherwise the packet will be
On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 05:19:24PM +0200, Lorenzo Bianconi wrote:
> Add buffering support for IPv4 packets that will be processed
> by arp {} action when L2 address is not discovered yet since
> otherwise the packet will be substituted with an ARP frame and
> this will result in the lost of the
Add buffering support for IPv4 packets that will be processed
by arp {} action when L2 address is not discovered yet since
otherwise the packet will be substituted with an ARP frame and
this will result in the lost of the first packet of the connection
Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Bianconi
---