On 22/06/2021 20:02, Pai G, Sunil wrote:
> Hey Kevin ,
>
> Patch looks good to me:
>
> Builds fine , all test cases here
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/openvswitch/patch/20210316154532.127858-1-ktray...@redhat.com/
> pass as well.
>
> Some minor nits inline :
>
>
>
>> diff --git
On 23/06/2021 14:04, David Marchand wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 4, 2021 at 11:19 PM Kevin Traynor wrote:
>>
>> This reworks the current rxq scheduling code to break it into more
>> generic and reusable pieces.
>>
>> The behaviour does not change from a user perspective, except the logs
>> are updated to
On Fri, Jun 4, 2021 at 11:19 PM Kevin Traynor wrote:
>
> This reworks the current rxq scheduling code to break it into more
> generic and reusable pieces.
>
> The behaviour does not change from a user perspective, except the logs
> are updated to be more consistent.
>
> From an implementation
Hey Kevin ,
Patch looks good to me:
Builds fine , all test cases here
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/openvswitch/patch/20210316154532.127858-1-ktray...@redhat.com/
pass as well.
Some minor nits inline :
> diff --git a/lib/dpif-netdev.c b/lib/dpif-netdev.c index 650e67ab3..57d23e112
This reworks the current rxq scheduling code to break it into more
generic and reusable pieces.
The behaviour does not change from a user perspective, except the logs
are updated to be more consistent.
>From an implementation view, there are some changes with mind to adding
functionality and
