You are right. I'll fix it.
On 1/10/2019 9:35 PM, Yifeng Sun wrote:
Hi,
When I try to understand this patch, I feel there may be some issue in this
loop below.
It looks like each loop is doing the same thing. Can you please take a look?
+for (i = 0; i < size; i++)
+if
Hi,
When I try to understand this patch, I feel there may be some issue in this
loop below.
It looks like each loop is doing the same thing. Can you please take a look?
+for (i = 0; i < size; i++)
+if (memcmp(pkey0, pkey1, size) == 0)
+memset(pmask, 0, size);
To improve performance and avoid wasting resources for HW offloaded
flows, do not rewrite fields that are matched with the same value.
Signed-off-by: Eli Britstein
Reviewed-by: Roi Dayan
---
lib/odp-util.c| 110 +-
tests/mpls-xlate.at |
