On Fri, Mar 06, 2020 at 02:47:50PM -0800, Han Zhou wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 6, 2020 at 2:32 PM Ben Pfaff wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 06:07:10PM -0800, Han Zhou wrote:
> > > When a leader handles install_snapshot reply, the next_index for
> > > the follower should be log_start instead of
On Fri, Mar 6, 2020 at 2:32 PM Ben Pfaff wrote:
>
> On Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 06:07:10PM -0800, Han Zhou wrote:
> > When a leader handles install_snapshot reply, the next_index for
> > the follower should be log_start instead of log_end, because there
> > can be new entries added in leader's log
On Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 06:07:10PM -0800, Han Zhou wrote:
> When a leader handles install_snapshot reply, the next_index for
> the follower should be log_start instead of log_end, because there
> can be new entries added in leader's log after initiating the
> install_snapshot procedure. Also, it
When a leader handles install_snapshot reply, the next_index for
the follower should be log_start instead of log_end, because there
can be new entries added in leader's log after initiating the
install_snapshot procedure. Also, it should send all the accumulated
entries to follower in the
