> On Jan 21, 2019, at 10:23 AM, Gregory Rose wrote:
>
> On 1/16/2019 8:03 AM, Aaron Conole wrote:
>> Following code looks like it might be wrong. I don't know much about
>> the way the stt infrastructure is being used, so feel free to ignore if
>> it is expected to return NETDEV_TX_OK even in
On 1/16/2019 8:03 AM, Aaron Conole wrote:
Following code looks like it might be wrong. I don't know much about
the way the stt infrastructure is being used, so feel free to ignore if
it is expected to return NETDEV_TX_OK even in error cases (just seems
strange).
Caught by compiler warning:
Following code looks like it might be wrong. I don't know much about
the way the stt infrastructure is being used, so feel free to ignore if
it is expected to return NETDEV_TX_OK even in error cases (just seems
strange).
Caught by compiler warning:
Following code looks like it might be wrong. I don't know much about
the way the stt infrastructure is being used, so feel free to ignore if
it is expected to return NETDEV_TX_OK even in error cases (just seems
strange).
---
datapath/
___
dev mailing
