On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 07:05:04PM +0800, Tonghao Zhang wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 14, 2018 at 2:16 AM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 05:52:46AM -0700, xiangxia.m@gmail.com wrote:
> >> From: Tonghao Zhang
> >>
> >> The bond of openvswitch has not good performance.
> >
> > I'd really
On Sat, Apr 14, 2018 at 2:16 AM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 05:52:46AM -0700, xiangxia.m@gmail.com wrote:
>> From: Tonghao Zhang
>>
>> The bond of openvswitch has not good performance.
>
> I'd really say that the best solution to that is to improve the
> performance, rather th
On Sat, Apr 14, 2018 at 2:15 AM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> Why is this series tagged "net-next"? It doesn't appear to have
> anything to do with the kernel.
sorry about that.
___
dev mailing list
d...@openvswitch.org
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listin
On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 05:52:46AM -0700, xiangxia.m@gmail.com wrote:
> From: Tonghao Zhang
>
> The bond of openvswitch has not good performance.
I'd really say that the best solution to that is to improve the
performance, rather than piling on another bonding layer.
___
Why is this series tagged "net-next"? It doesn't appear to have
anything to do with the kernel.
___
dev mailing list
d...@openvswitch.org
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
> To: d...@openvswitch.org
> Subject: [ovs-dev] [PATCH net-next 0/6] Add dpdk-bond support
>
> From: Tonghao Zhang
>
> The bond of openvswitch has not good performance. In some
> cases we would recommend that you use Linux bonds instead
> of Open vSwitch bonds. In userspac
From: Tonghao Zhang
The bond of openvswitch has not good performance. In some
cases we would recommend that you use Linux bonds instead
of Open vSwitch bonds. In userspace datapath, we wants use
bond to improve bandwidth. The DPDK has implemented it as lib.
These patches base DPDK bond to implem
