On Fri, 20 Nov 2020 07:32:11 +0100 Florian Westphal wrote:
> Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > On Mon, 16 Nov 2020 18:31:26 +0530 nusid...@redhat.com wrote:
> > > From: Numan Siddique
> > >
> > > There is no easy way to distinguish if a conntracked tcp packet is
> > > marked invalid because of tcp_in_
Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Nov 2020 18:31:26 +0530 nusid...@redhat.com wrote:
> > From: Numan Siddique
> >
> > There is no easy way to distinguish if a conntracked tcp packet is
> > marked invalid because of tcp_in_window() check error or because
> > it doesn't belong to an existing conn
On Mon, 16 Nov 2020 18:31:26 +0530 nusid...@redhat.com wrote:
> From: Numan Siddique
>
> There is no easy way to distinguish if a conntracked tcp packet is
> marked invalid because of tcp_in_window() check error or because
> it doesn't belong to an existing connection. With this patch,
> openvswi
From: Numan Siddique
There is no easy way to distinguish if a conntracked tcp packet is
marked invalid because of tcp_in_window() check error or because
it doesn't belong to an existing connection. With this patch,
openvswitch sets liberal tcp flag for the established sessions so
that out of wind