I agree.
Yes, we needed to check the build on version 22.03.
Sorry.
___
dev mailing list
d...@openvswitch.org
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
On 6/9/23 21:13, Mark Michelson wrote:
> I pushed this change to main and all branches back to 22.03. Thanks!
>
Branch 22.03 doesn't have run_update_worker_pool() so this backport
broke compilation there. I posted a 22.03-only revert patch:
Great!
You are welcome!
___
dev mailing list
d...@openvswitch.org
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
I pushed this change to main and all branches back to 22.03. Thanks!
On 6/7/23 15:21, Mark Michelson wrote:
Thanks, Igor.
Acked-by: Mark Michelson
On 6/6/23 20:37, Igor Zhukov wrote:
From: Igor Zhukov
You can check logs by running: make check-valgrind TESTSUITEFLAGS="246"
(Actually
Thanks, Igor.
Acked-by: Mark Michelson
On 6/6/23 20:37, Igor Zhukov wrote:
From: Igor Zhukov
You can check logs by running: make check-valgrind TESTSUITEFLAGS="246"
(Actually almost every test affected but for example we need one test)
Valgrind message looks like
==65437== 304 bytes in 1
From: Igor Zhukov
You can check logs by running: make check-valgrind TESTSUITEFLAGS="246"
(Actually almost every test affected but for example we need one test)
Valgrind message looks like
==65437== 304 bytes in 1 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 265 of 289
==65437==at 0x483DD99:
