On Wed, Sep 15, 2021 at 8:12 PM Odintsov Vladislav wrote:
>
> Hi Numan,
>
> for me this patch solves the issue.
> Actually, it’s a good point about adding test for ovn-controller-vtep to
> eliminate this problem in future.
> However there was another problem with HW VTEP support in OVN with using
Hi Numan,
for me this patch solves the issue.
Actually, it’s a good point about adding test for ovn-controller-vtep to
eliminate this problem in future.
However there was another problem with HW VTEP support in OVN with using
stateful services in the datapath.
I’ve sent a patch series with a te
On Wed, Sep 8, 2021 at 5:59 AM Mark Gray wrote:
>
> On 07/09/2021 18:15, num...@ovn.org wrote:
> > From: Numan Siddique
> >
> > When a vtep logical port changes, necessary flows are not added as
> > expected. This is because the function physical_handle_flows_for_lport()
> > in physical.c does n
On 07/09/2021 18:15, num...@ovn.org wrote:
> From: Numan Siddique
>
> When a vtep logical port changes, necessary flows are not added as
> expected. This is because the function physical_handle_flows_for_lport()
> in physical.c does not add flows required for vtep logical ports.
> These flows ar
From: Numan Siddique
When a vtep logical port changes, necessary flows are not added as
expected. This is because the function physical_handle_flows_for_lport()
in physical.c does not add flows required for vtep logical ports.
These flows are added by physical_run(). So fall back to full recompu
