Hi, Ales, Daniel,
On 6/15/22 14:36, Daniel Alvarez Sanchez wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 15, 2022 at 1:54 PM Ales Musil wrote:
>
>> Hi Daniel,
>>
>> thank you for the suggestions, please see my replies inline.
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 15, 2022 at 1:00 PM Daniel Alvarez Sanchez <
>> dalva...@redhat.com> wrote:
On Wed, Jun 15, 2022 at 1:54 PM Ales Musil wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> thank you for the suggestions, please see my replies inline.
>
> On Wed, Jun 15, 2022 at 1:00 PM Daniel Alvarez Sanchez <
> dalva...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> Hey Ales, first of all thanks a lot for this series!! Great job and good
Hi Daniel,
thank you for the suggestions, please see my replies inline.
On Wed, Jun 15, 2022 at 1:00 PM Daniel Alvarez Sanchez
wrote:
> Hey Ales, first of all thanks a lot for this series!! Great job and good
> approach.
>
> I however have some concerns but maybe they're not much of a deal,
Hey Ales, first of all thanks a lot for this series!! Great job and good
approach.
I however have some concerns but maybe they're not much of a deal, please
let me know what you think:
- Broadcast gARPs will cause all ovn-controller instances in the cluster to
attempt to write into the SB
Add MAC binding aging mechanism, that
should take care of stale MAC bindings.
The mechanism works on "ownership" of the
MAC binding row. The chassis that creates
the row is then checking if the "idle_age"
of the flow is over the aging threshold.
In that case the MAC binding is removed
from
