On Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at 4:20 PM Dumitru Ceara wrote:
>
> On 8/6/20 9:57 AM, Numan Siddique wrote:
> > Thanks Ankur for the lengthy reply.
> >
> > Please see below for some comments.
> >
> > Thanks
> > Numan
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 9:23 AM Ankur Sharma
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Numan,
On 8/6/20 9:57 AM, Numan Siddique wrote:
> Thanks Ankur for the lengthy reply.
>
> Please see below for some comments.
>
> Thanks
> Numan
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 9:23 AM Ankur Sharma
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Numan, Daniel, Lucas,
>>
>> Thank you so much for the feedback and providing your
Thanks Ankur for the lengthy reply.
Please see below for some comments.
Thanks
Numan
On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 9:23 AM Ankur Sharma
wrote:
> Hi Numan, Daniel, Lucas,
>
> Thank you so much for the feedback and providing your inputs.
> I went the through the bug that was being referenced and
Hi Numan, Daniel, Lucas,
Thank you so much for the feedback and providing your inputs.
I went the through the bug that was being referenced and Numan's inputs and
following is my take on it.
Its a lengthy email, if you just want to look at the suggestions for fix then
please scroll to the
Hi Numan,
Sorry, was a little out of sync with mailing list this week.
I will get back to you sometime early next week.
But yes, using chassis mac for router port ip is not correct ?.
Let me check the scenario you have called out and will try to propose
alternatives.
Regards,
Ankur
On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 11:56 AM Numan Siddique wrote:
> +Daniel Alvarez Sanchez
> +Lucas Alvares Gomes Martins
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 11:29 AM Ankur Sharma
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Numan,
>>
>> Thank you so much for the details.
>>
>>
> Hi Ankur,
>
> Thanks for the detailed email. Your
+Daniel Alvarez Sanchez
+Lucas Alvares Gomes Martins
On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 11:29 AM Ankur Sharma
wrote:
> Hi Numan,
>
> Thank you so much for the details.
>
>
Hi Ankur,
Thanks for the detailed email. Your analysis is correct. I have few
comments.
Please see below.
> Following is my
Hi Numan,
Thank you so much for the details.
Following is my analysis on the feature:
a. Port of type EXTERNAL means that we create a logical switch port in OVN
without a VIF backing.
b. i.e the physical port corresponding to external port is NOT behind OVN
managed vswitch (for SRIOV specific
On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 4:41 PM Numan Siddique wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 12:45 AM Ankur Sharma
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Numan, Daniel,
>>
>> I have not looked at the patch yet. But replacing arp.sha with chassis
>> mac is not the correct approach from networking perspective.
>> Chassic mac
On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 12:45 AM Ankur Sharma
wrote:
> Hi Numan, Daniel,
>
> I have not looked at the patch yet. But replacing arp.sha with chassis mac
> is not the correct approach from networking perspective.
> Chassic mac is NOT meant to replace the IP-MAC binding of router port, it
> is ONLY
Hi Numan, Daniel,
I have not looked at the patch yet. But replacing arp.sha with chassis mac is
not the correct approach from networking perspective.
Chassic mac is NOT meant to replace the IP-MAC binding of router port, it is
ONLY meant to ensure that for EW traffic a distributed router port
From: Numan Siddique
Routing for external logical ports is broken if these ports belonged
to bridged logical switches (with localnet port) and 'ovn-chassis-mac-mappings'
is configured. External logical ports are those which are external to OVN,
but there is a logical port for it and it is
12 matches
Mail list logo
