On 12/6/21 02:49, Mike Pattrick wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 3, 2021 at 8:15 PM Ilya Maximets wrote:
>>
>> On 11/30/21 22:31, Mike Pattrick wrote:
>>> If anonymous memory mapping is supported by the kernel, it's better
>>> to run OVS entirely in memory rather than creating shared data
>>> structures. OVS
On Fri, Dec 3, 2021 at 8:15 PM Ilya Maximets wrote:
>
> On 11/30/21 22:31, Mike Pattrick wrote:
> > If anonymous memory mapping is supported by the kernel, it's better
> > to run OVS entirely in memory rather than creating shared data
> > structures. OVS doesn't work in multi-process mode, so
On 11/30/21 22:31, Mike Pattrick wrote:
> If anonymous memory mapping is supported by the kernel, it's better
> to run OVS entirely in memory rather than creating shared data
> structures. OVS doesn't work in multi-process mode, so there is no need
> to litter a filesystem and experience random
Bleep bloop. Greetings Mike Pattrick, I am a robot and I have tried out your
patch.
Thanks for your contribution.
I encountered some error that I wasn't expecting. See the details below.
checkpatch:
WARNING: Unexpected sign-offs from developers who are not authors or co-authors
or
If anonymous memory mapping is supported by the kernel, it's better
to run OVS entirely in memory rather than creating shared data
structures. OVS doesn't work in multi-process mode, so there is no need
to litter a filesystem and experience random crashes due to old memory
chunks stored in
