On Wed, May 09, 2018 at 04:41:05PM +0200, Eelco Chaudron wrote:
> On 13/04/18 20:02, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> >On Fri, Feb 09, 2018 at 03:42:56PM +0100, Eelco Chaudron wrote:
> >>This patch will make sure VXLAN tunnels with and without the group
> >>based policy (GBP) option enabled can not coexist on th
On 13/04/18 20:02, Ben Pfaff wrote:
On Fri, Feb 09, 2018 at 03:42:56PM +0100, Eelco Chaudron wrote:
This patch will make sure VXLAN tunnels with and without the group
based policy (GBP) option enabled can not coexist on the same
destination UDP port.
In theory, VXLAN tunnel with and without GBP
On Fri, Feb 09, 2018 at 03:42:56PM +0100, Eelco Chaudron wrote:
> This patch will make sure VXLAN tunnels with and without the group
> based policy (GBP) option enabled can not coexist on the same
> destination UDP port.
>
> In theory, VXLAN tunnel with and without GBP enables can be
> multiplexed
Any feedback on this patch?
On 09/02/18 15:42, Eelco Chaudron wrote:
This patch will make sure VXLAN tunnels with and without the group
based policy (GBP) option enabled can not coexist on the same
destination UDP port.
In theory, VXLAN tunnel with and without GBP enables can be
multiplexed on
This patch will make sure VXLAN tunnels with and without the group
based policy (GBP) option enabled can not coexist on the same
destination UDP port.
In theory, VXLAN tunnel with and without GBP enables can be
multiplexed on the same UDP port as long as different VNI's are
used. However currently
