On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 04:27:04PM -0800, Mickey Spiegel wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 2:48 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>
> > Until now, formatting the "next" action has always required including
> > the table number, because the action struct didn't include enough context
> > so that
On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 2:48 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> Until now, formatting the "next" action has always required including
> the table number, because the action struct didn't include enough context
> so that the formatter could decide whether the table number was the next
> table