Thanks.
I'll look forward to a patch from you to keep slow_path flows.
On Tue, Feb 06, 2018 at 08:08:32PM +0800, Huanle Han wrote:
> "ODP_FIT_TOO_LITTLE" patches are good to me.
>
> On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 1:31 AM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> > That sounds like a good idea. Do you want to try to write u
"ODP_FIT_TOO_LITTLE" patches are good to me.
On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 1:31 AM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> That sounds like a good idea. Do you want to try to write up a patch
> for that approach?
>
> The current series still seems like a good idea to me, do you have an
> opinion?
>
> On Mon, Feb 05, 2018
That sounds like a good idea. Do you want to try to write up a patch
for that approach?
The current series still seems like a good idea to me, do you have an
opinion?
On Mon, Feb 05, 2018 at 07:57:20PM +0800, Huanle Han wrote:
> The patches make "ODP_FIT_TOO_LITTLE" logic more clear for me.
> Bu
The patches make "ODP_FIT_TOO_LITTLE" logic more clear for me.
But it seems not fix the problem I mentioned at beginnig:
revalidate_ukey__() always return UKEY_DELETE for igmp, because
flow_wildcards_has_extra() return true.
Should we UKEY_KEEP igmp or other "ODP_FIT_TOO_LITTLE" flows whose
action
OVS datapaths don't understand or parse IGMP fields, but OVS userspace
does, so this commit updates odp_flow_key_to_flow() to report that properly
to the caller.
Reported-by: Huanle Han
Reported-at:
https://mail.openvswitch.org/pipermail/ovs-dev/2018-January/343665.html
Signed-off-by: Ben Pfaff
