Are you sure? I see it on branches for both 2.12 and 2.11.
On Fri, Jan 31, 2020 at 08:24:48AM -0500, Mark Michelson wrote:
> It appears this flew under the radar and was never reviewed/merged. Would it
> be possible for an OVS maintainer to have a quick look at this backport and
> get it merged
It appears this flew under the radar and was never reviewed/merged.
Would it be possible for an OVS maintainer to have a quick look at this
backport and get it merged into OVS 2.12 and 2.11 if possible?
On 11/12/19 11:59 AM, Mark Michelson wrote:
This is a backport to OVS 2.12 of OVN master
I applied it to both branches. Thank you for asking for backports.
On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 12:01:42PM -0500, Mark Michelson wrote:
> In addition to applying this to 2.12, I am requesting a backport to 2.11 as
> well. Thank you.
>
> On 11/12/19 11:59 AM, Mark Michelson wrote:
> > This is a
Bleep bloop. Greetings Mark Michelson, I am a robot and I have tried out your
patch.
Thanks for your contribution.
I encountered some error that I wasn't expecting. See the details below.
git-am:
Failed to merge in the changes.
Patch failed at 0001 ovn: Prevent erroneous duplicate IP address
In addition to applying this to 2.12, I am requesting a backport to 2.11
as well. Thank you.
On 11/12/19 11:59 AM, Mark Michelson wrote:
This is a backport to OVS 2.12 of OVN master commit 21c29d5b0c.
When using dynamic address assignment for logical switches, OVN reserves
the first address
This is a backport to OVS 2.12 of OVN master commit 21c29d5b0c.
When using dynamic address assignment for logical switches, OVN reserves
the first address in the subnet for the attached router port to use.
In commit 488d153ee87841c042af05bc0eb8b5481aaa98cf, the IPAM code was
modified to add
