>
> On 02/21/2017 10:49 AM, Jan Scheurich wrote:
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From: Kevin Traynor [mailto:ktray...@redhat.com]
> >> Sent: Friday, 17 February, 2017 17:38
> >>
> >> If there are multiple queues in a poll list and only one has packets,
> >> the cycles polling the empty
On 02/21/2017 10:49 AM, Jan Scheurich wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Kevin Traynor [mailto:ktray...@redhat.com]
>> Sent: Friday, 17 February, 2017 17:38
>>
>> If there are multiple queues in a poll list and only one has packets,
>> the cycles polling the empty queues for packets
> -Original Message-
> From: Kevin Traynor [mailto:ktray...@redhat.com]
> Sent: Friday, 17 February, 2017 17:38
>
> If there are multiple queues in a poll list and only one has packets,
> the cycles polling the empty queues for packets will be counted in the
> processing time - whereas
>
> On 02/17/2017 10:39 AM, Ciara Loftus wrote:
> > Instead of counting all polling cycles as processing cycles, only count
> > the cycles where packets were received from the polling.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Georg Schmuecking
> > Signed-off-by: Ciara Loftus
On 02/17/2017 10:39 AM, Ciara Loftus wrote:
> Instead of counting all polling cycles as processing cycles, only count
> the cycles where packets were received from the polling.
>
> Signed-off-by: Georg Schmuecking
> Signed-off-by: Ciara Loftus
Instead of counting all polling cycles as processing cycles, only count
the cycles where packets were received from the polling.
Signed-off-by: Georg Schmuecking
Signed-off-by: Ciara Loftus
Co-authored-by: Georg Schmuecking