On Wed, 2021-11-03 at 16:53 +0100, Ilya Maximets wrote:
> On 10/27/21 17:48, Mike Pattrick wrote:
> > Currently the ovs-tcpdump utility creates a virtual tunnel to send
> > packets to. This method functions perfectly fine, however, it can
> > greatly impact performance of the monitored port.
> >
On 10/27/21 17:48, Mike Pattrick wrote:
> Currently the ovs-tcpdump utility creates a virtual tunnel to send
> packets to. This method functions perfectly fine, however, it can
> greatly impact performance of the monitored port.
>
> It has been reported to reduce packet throughput significantly.
On Wed, Oct 27, 2021, at 17:48, Mike Pattrick wrote:
> Currently the ovs-tcpdump utility creates a virtual tunnel to send
> packets to. This method functions perfectly fine, however, it can
> greatly impact performance of the monitored port.
>
> It has been reported to reduce packet throughput
Mike Pattrick writes:
> Currently the ovs-tcpdump utility creates a virtual tunnel to send
> packets to. This method functions perfectly fine, however, it can
> greatly impact performance of the monitored port.
>
> It has been reported to reduce packet throughput significantly. I was
> able to
Currently the ovs-tcpdump utility creates a virtual tunnel to send
packets to. This method functions perfectly fine, however, it can
greatly impact performance of the monitored port.
It has been reported to reduce packet throughput significantly. I was
able to reproduce a reduction in throughput
