> > Hi Michael,
> >
> > The patch uses MTU sizes > 9000 values to check and fail but 9000 may
> > not be good value for older NICs As they might fail the test ?
> >
> > Can we kind of confirm is MTU > 9000 is safe if not we can just use a
> > lower value like 1500 etc etc to be safe So that we
> Hi Michael,
>
> The patch uses MTU sizes > 9000 values to check and fail but 9000 may not
> be good value for older NICs
> As they might fail the test ?
>
> Can we kind of confirm is MTU > 9000 is safe if not we can just use a lower
> value like 1500 etc etc to be safe
> So that we don't
Hi Michael,
The patch uses MTU sizes > 9000 values to check and fail but 9000 may not be
good value for older NICs
As they might fail the test ?
Can we kind of confirm is MTU > 9000 is safe if not we can just use a lower
value like 1500 etc etc to be safe
So that we don't fail un-necessary
Hi Mike,
Thanks for reworking the tests.
One minor nit inline, otherwise patch LGTM,
> -Original Message-
> From: Phelan, Michael
> Sent: Monday, July 11, 2022 7:19 PM
> To: d...@openvswitch.org
> Cc: Stokes, Ian ; acon...@redhat.com;
> i.maxim...@ovn.org; maxime.coque...@redhat.com;
This adds 8 new unit tests to the 'check-dpdk' subsystem that will
test Maximum Transmission Unit (MTU) functionality.
Signed-off-by: Michael Phelan
Signed-off-by: Sunil Pai G
Co-authored-by: Sunil Pai G
---
v3:
- Capitalize first letter in comments.
- Add [] in AT_CHECK commands.
-
