; To: Chandran, Sugesh ; Ilya Maximets
> ; ovs-dev@openvswitch.org; Ben Pfaff
>
> Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH v3 0/2] conntrack : Add support for rx
> chceksum offload.
>
> Hi Sugesh
>
> For future reference, the naming guidelines are
uly 10, 2017 5:53 PM
> > To: Ilya Maximets ; ovs-
> d...@openvswitch.org;
> > Ben Pfaff
> > Cc: Chandran, Sugesh ; Traynor, Kevin
> >
> > Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH v3 0/2] conntrack : Add support for rx
> > chceksum offload.
> >
>
Ball [mailto:db...@vmware.com]
> Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 5:53 PM
> To: Ilya Maximets ; ovs-dev@openvswitch.org;
> Ben Pfaff
> Cc: Chandran, Sugesh ; Traynor, Kevin
>
> Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH v3 0/2] conntrack : Add support for rx
> chceksum offloa
[ovs-dev] [PATCH v3 0/2] conntrack : Add support for rx
> chceksum offload.
>
>
>
> On 7/10/17, 1:37 AM, "Ilya Maximets" wrote:
>
> > ‘chceksum’ is misspelled
> >
> > Since these patches really only affect ‘dpdk’, the module name ‘dpdk’
On 7/10/17, 1:37 AM, "Ilya Maximets" wrote:
> ‘chceksum’ is misspelled
>
> Since these patches really only affect ‘dpdk’, the module name ‘dpdk’ may
more accurately
> reflect the real effect of these patches.
Please, don't do that. Only patches that changes lib/dpdk.{
rrell Ball ; Ben Pfaff
>
> Cc: Chandran, Sugesh ; Traynor, Kevin
>
> Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH v3 0/2] conntrack : Add support for rx
> chceksum offload.
>
> > ‘chceksum’ is misspelled
> >
[Sugesh] Will correct in next version.
&g
Regards
_Sugesh
> -Original Message-
> From: Ilya Maximets [mailto:i.maxim...@samsung.com]
> Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 9:37 AM
> To: ovs-dev@openvswitch.org; Darrell Ball ; Ben Pfaff
>
> Cc: Chandran, Sugesh ; Traynor, Kevin
>
> Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH
> ‘chceksum’ is misspelled
>
> Since these patches really only affect ‘dpdk’, the module name ‘dpdk’ may
> more accurately
> reflect the real effect of these patches.
Please, don't do that. Only patches that changes lib/dpdk.{c,h} should
have 'dpdk' prefix in subject line. All other patches shou
‘chceksum’ is misspelled
Since these patches really only affect ‘dpdk’, the module name ‘dpdk’ may more
accurately
reflect the real effect of these patches.
btw, I think there have been significant changes b/w V2 and V3…
On 6/27/17, 7:39 AM, "Sugesh Chandran" wrote:
Conntrack need not v
Conntrack need not verify the checksum of incoming packets if its validated by
DPDK physical NIC ports.
Also make use the DPDK rx checksum mask bits along with flags while validating
the reported hardware checksum state.
v2->v3
- Rebased on latest master.
- Updated the existing checksum validat
10 matches
Mail list logo
