On 27/10/2020 14:03, Ilya Maximets wrote:
> On 10/20/20 1:15 PM, Kevin Traynor wrote:
>> On 16/09/2020 16:17, Gaetan Rivet wrote:
>>> In some cloud topologies, using DPDK VF representors in guest requires
>>> configuring a VF before it is assigned to the guest.
>>>
>>> A first basic option for
On 28/10/20 02:58 +0100, Gaëtan Rivet wrote:
[...]
> > >
> > >> +}
> > >> }
> > >> ovs_mutex_unlock(>mutex);
> > >>
> > >> @@ -1898,6 +1918,7 @@ netdev_dpdk_set_config(struct netdev *netdev,
> > >> const struct smap *args,
> > >> {RTE_FC_RX_PAUSE, RTE_FC_FULL}
Hi Ilya, Kevin,
Thanks for the remarks, I will fix them.
However I have two questions inline.
On 27/10/20 15:03 +0100, Ilya Maximets wrote:
> On 10/20/20 1:15 PM, Kevin Traynor wrote:
> > On 16/09/2020 16:17, Gaetan Rivet wrote:
> >> In some cloud topologies, using DPDK VF representors in guest
On 10/20/20 1:15 PM, Kevin Traynor wrote:
> On 16/09/2020 16:17, Gaetan Rivet wrote:
>> In some cloud topologies, using DPDK VF representors in guest requires
>> configuring a VF before it is assigned to the guest.
>>
>> A first basic option for such configuration is setting the VF MAC
>> address.
On 16/09/2020 16:17, Gaetan Rivet wrote:
> In some cloud topologies, using DPDK VF representors in guest requires
> configuring a VF before it is assigned to the guest.
>
> A first basic option for such configuration is setting the VF MAC
> address. Add a key 'dpdk-vf-mac' to the 'options' column
Bleep bloop. Greetings Gaetan Rivet, I am a robot and I have tried out your
patch.
Thanks for your contribution.
I encountered some error that I wasn't expecting. See the details below.
checkpatch:
WARNING: Line is 97 characters long (recommended limit is 79)
#52 FILE:
In some cloud topologies, using DPDK VF representors in guest requires
configuring a VF before it is assigned to the guest.
A first basic option for such configuration is setting the VF MAC
address. Add a key 'dpdk-vf-mac' to the 'options' column of the Interface
table.
This option can be used
