On 04.07.2019 16:59, Ian Stokes wrote:
> On 7/4/2019 12:15 PM, Ilya Maximets wrote:
>> Few comments inline.
>> Probably, could be fixed while applying the patch.
>
> Ok, these look reasonable to me. I can apply them this evening before
> committing.
>
> If I add these will I had an ACK for you
On 7/4/2019 12:15 PM, Ilya Maximets wrote:
Few comments inline.
Probably, could be fixed while applying the patch.
Ok, these look reasonable to me. I can apply them this evening before
committing.
If I add these will I had an ACK for you Ilya?
Regards
Ian
On 02.07.2019 3:32, Kevin
Few comments inline.
Probably, could be fixed while applying the patch.
On 02.07.2019 3:32, Kevin Traynor wrote:
> vhost tx retries can provide some mitigation against
> dropped packets due to a temporarily slow guest/limited queue
> size for an interface, but on the other hand when a system
> is
On 3 Jul 2019, at 18:07, Ian Stokes wrote:
On 7/2/2019 1:32 AM, Kevin Traynor wrote:
vhost tx retries can provide some mitigation against
dropped packets due to a temporarily slow guest/limited queue
size for an interface, but on the other hand when a system
is fully loaded those extra
On 7/2/2019 1:32 AM, Kevin Traynor wrote:
vhost tx retries can provide some mitigation against
dropped packets due to a temporarily slow guest/limited queue
size for an interface, but on the other hand when a system
is fully loaded those extra cycles retrying could mean
packets are dropped
vhost tx retries can provide some mitigation against
dropped packets due to a temporarily slow guest/limited queue
size for an interface, but on the other hand when a system
is fully loaded those extra cycles retrying could mean
packets are dropped elsewhere.
Up to now max vhost tx retries have
