Hi Guoshuai,
Thanks for the feedback. I am glad it is useful for you. And you have a
very valid point that the current patch breaks the connection status
feature. I didn't think about the detailed fix yet but in general I think
it might be reasonable to add a "proxy" layer of HV-local SB DB, which
This is very useful to me.
I found a problem in my use:
In the ovn-controller and the south of the database connection，when the
ovn-controller as a passive service, the SB as a client, such as
configured to
ovs-vsctl set Open_vSwitch . external-ids:ovn-remote=ptcp:6644:0.0.0.0
ovn-sbctl set-c
This patch introduces multi-threading for ovn-controller and use
dedicated thread for packet-in processing as a start. It decouples
packet-in processing and ovs flow computing, so that packet-in inputs
won't trigger flow recomputing, and flow computing won't block
packet-in processing. In large sca
