Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH v4 4/5] dpif-netdev: Fix PMD auto load balance with pmd-rxq-isolate.

2022-03-23 Thread Kevin Traynor
On 22/03/2022 15:36, David Marchand wrote: On Fri, Mar 11, 2022 at 6:06 PM Kevin Traynor wrote: There are currently some checks for cross-numa polling cases to ensure that they won't effect the accuracy of the PMD ALB. If an rxq is pinned to a pmd core by the user it will not be I prefer "P

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH v4 4/5] dpif-netdev: Fix PMD auto load balance with pmd-rxq-isolate.

2022-03-22 Thread David Marchand
On Fri, Mar 11, 2022 at 6:06 PM Kevin Traynor wrote: > > There are currently some checks for cross-numa polling cases to > ensure that they won't effect the accuracy of the PMD ALB. > > If an rxq is pinned to a pmd core by the user it will not be I prefer "PMD thread" for consistency (both in com

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH v4 4/5] dpif-netdev: Fix PMD auto load balance with pmd-rxq-isolate.

2022-03-11 Thread Mike Pattrick
On Fri, Mar 11, 2022 at 12:06 PM Kevin Traynor wrote: > > There are currently some checks for cross-numa polling cases to > ensure that they won't effect the accuracy of the PMD ALB. > > If an rxq is pinned to a pmd core by the user it will not be > reassigned by OVS, so even if it is non-local nu

[ovs-dev] [PATCH v4 4/5] dpif-netdev: Fix PMD auto load balance with pmd-rxq-isolate.

2022-03-11 Thread Kevin Traynor
There are currently some checks for cross-numa polling cases to ensure that they won't effect the accuracy of the PMD ALB. If an rxq is pinned to a pmd core by the user it will not be reassigned by OVS, so even if it is non-local numa polled it will not impact PMD ALB accuracy. To establish this,