>
> Looks good to me.
>
> Acked-by: Ilya Maximets
>
I'll pull this in with this week's pull request, thanks all for the effort.
Thanks
Ian
> On 31.08.2018 11:47, Kevin Traynor wrote:
> > Prior to OVS 2.9 automatic assignment of Rxqs to PMDs (i.e. CPUs) was
> > done by round-robin.
> >
> >
Looks good to me.
Acked-by: Ilya Maximets
On 31.08.2018 11:47, Kevin Traynor wrote:
> Prior to OVS 2.9 automatic assignment of Rxqs to PMDs
> (i.e. CPUs) was done by round-robin.
>
> That was changed in OVS 2.9 to ordering the Rxqs based on
> their measured processing cycles. This was to
On 08/31/2018 09:56 AM, Eelco Chaudron wrote:
>
>
> On 31 Aug 2018, at 10:47, Kevin Traynor wrote:
>
>> Prior to OVS 2.9 automatic assignment of Rxqs to PMDs
>> (i.e. CPUs) was done by round-robin.
>>
>> That was changed in OVS 2.9 to ordering the Rxqs based on
>> their measured processing
On 31 Aug 2018, at 10:47, Kevin Traynor wrote:
Prior to OVS 2.9 automatic assignment of Rxqs to PMDs
(i.e. CPUs) was done by round-robin.
That was changed in OVS 2.9 to ordering the Rxqs based on
their measured processing cycles. This was to assign the
busiest Rxqs to different PMDs,
Prior to OVS 2.9 automatic assignment of Rxqs to PMDs
(i.e. CPUs) was done by round-robin.
That was changed in OVS 2.9 to ordering the Rxqs based on
their measured processing cycles. This was to assign the
busiest Rxqs to different PMDs, improving aggregate
throughput.
For the most part the new
