On Mon, Mar 27, 2023 at 5:03 PM Eelco Chaudron wrote:
>
> I did not review this, but I noticed you do null checks for memset() and
> memcpy(). But there are functions for this in OVS like nullable_memset() and
> nullable_memcpy(), maybe some of the changes might benefit from using this.
>
> In
On 3/27/23 11:03, Eelco Chaudron wrote:
>
>
> On 16 Mar 2023, at 17:36, James Raphael Tiovalen wrote:
>
>> This commit addresses several high and medium-impact Coverity defects by
>> fixing several possible null-pointer dereferences and potentially
>> uninitialized variables.
>>
>> There were
On 16 Mar 2023, at 17:36, James Raphael Tiovalen wrote:
> This commit addresses several high and medium-impact Coverity defects by
> fixing several possible null-pointer dereferences and potentially
> uninitialized variables.
>
> There were cases when crashes were encountered when some null
Hi folks,
Anything that I can do to move this patch forward? I did consider
splitting this patch up into smaller chunks, but I am not sure if it
would be helpful since the main changes in this patch are mostly
similar, just spread across multiple functions and files. That said,
if it would make
This commit addresses several high and medium-impact Coverity defects by
fixing several possible null-pointer dereferences and potentially
uninitialized variables.
There were cases when crashes were encountered when some null pointers
were dereferenced. Null pointer checks and alternative code
