On 10/30/23 10:50, jm...@redhat.com wrote:
> From: Jakob Meng
>
> For better usability, the function pairs get_config() and
> set_config() for netdevs should be symmetric: Options which are
> accepted by set_config() should be returned by get_config() and the
> latter should output valid options
On 30/10/2023 09:50, jm...@redhat.com wrote:
From: Jakob Meng
For better usability, the function pairs get_config() and
set_config() for netdevs should be symmetric: Options which are
accepted by set_config() should be returned by get_config() and the
latter should output valid options for set_c
, Oct 30, 2023 at 10:50:
From: Jakob Meng
For better usability, the function pairs get_config() and
set_config() for netdevs should be symmetric: Options which are
accepted by set_config() should be returned by get_config() and the
latter should output valid options for set_config() only.
This
From: Jakob Meng
For better usability, the function pairs get_config() and
set_config() for netdevs should be symmetric: Options which are
accepted by set_config() should be returned by get_config() and the
latter should output valid options for set_config() only.
This patch moves key-value pair