Re: [ovs-dev] [RFC PATCH V4 5/9] dp-packet: init specific mbuf fields to 0

2017-12-12 Thread Chandran, Sugesh
ara > <ciara.lof...@intel.com>; > santosh.shu...@caviumnetworks.com > Subject: RE: [ovs-dev][RFC PATCH V4 5/9] dp-packet: init specific mbuf fields > to > 0 > > >From: Chandran, Sugesh > >Sent: Friday, December 8, 2017 6:00 PM > >To: Kavanagh, Mark B <ma

Re: [ovs-dev] [RFC PATCH V4 5/9] dp-packet: init specific mbuf fields to 0

2017-12-12 Thread Kavanagh, Mark B
switch.org; qiud...@chinac.com >> Cc: Stokes, Ian <ian.sto...@intel.com>; Loftus, Ciara ><ciara.lof...@intel.com>; >> santosh.shu...@caviumnetworks.com; Chandran, Sugesh >> <sugesh.chand...@intel.com>; Kavanagh, Mark B >> <mark.b.kavan...@intel.com> &g

Re: [ovs-dev] [RFC PATCH V4 5/9] dp-packet: init specific mbuf fields to 0

2017-12-08 Thread Chandran, Sugesh
u...@caviumnetworks.com; Chandran, Sugesh > <sugesh.chand...@intel.com>; Kavanagh, Mark B > <mark.b.kavan...@intel.com> > Subject: [ovs-dev][RFC PATCH V4 5/9] dp-packet: init specific mbuf fields to 0 > > dp_packets are created using xmalloc(); in the case of OvS-DPDK, it'

[ovs-dev] [RFC PATCH V4 5/9] dp-packet: init specific mbuf fields to 0

2017-12-08 Thread Mark Kavanagh
dp_packets are created using xmalloc(); in the case of OvS-DPDK, it's possible the the resultant mbuf portion of the dp_packet contains random data. For some mbuf fields, specifically those related to multi-segment mbufs and/or offload features, random values may cause unexpected behaviour, should