On 18.12.2017 16:20, Loftus, Ciara wrote:
>>
>> On 18.12.2017 15:28, Loftus, Ciara wrote:
Not a full review.
>>>
>>> Thanks for your feedback.
>>>
General thoughts:
If following conditions are true:
1. We don't need to add new feature to deprecated vhostuser
>
> On 18.12.2017 15:28, Loftus, Ciara wrote:
> >>
> >> Not a full review.
> >
> > Thanks for your feedback.
> >
> >>
> >> General thoughts:
> >>
> >> If following conditions are true:
> >>
> >> 1. We don't need to add new feature to deprecated vhostuser port.
> >
> > Agree.
> >
> >>
> >> 2. We
On 18.12.2017 15:28, Loftus, Ciara wrote:
>>
>> Not a full review.
>
> Thanks for your feedback.
>
>>
>> General thoughts:
>>
>> If following conditions are true:
>>
>> 1. We don't need to add new feature to deprecated vhostuser port.
>
> Agree.
>
>>
>> 2. We actually don't need to have
>
> Not a full review.
Thanks for your feedback.
>
> General thoughts:
>
> If following conditions are true:
>
> 1. We don't need to add new feature to deprecated vhostuser port.
Agree.
>
> 2. We actually don't need to have ability to change ZC config if vhost-server-
> path
>already
> On 12/15/2017 12:32 PM, Jan Scheurich wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> What if we have 2, 4, 10 HW NICs and a few different destinations for
> traffic from VM?
> What if we have 2, 4, 10 HW NICs added to balanced OVS bonding and
> just a few different packet flows?
> What if we have HW NICs
On 12/15/2017 09:39 AM, Ilya Maximets wrote:
>>> What if we have 2, 4, 10 HW NICs and a few different destinations for
>>> traffic from VM?
>>> What if we have 2, 4, 10 HW NICs added to balanced OVS bonding and just a
>>> few different packet flows?
>>> What if we have HW NICs with small number
On 12/15/2017 12:32 PM, Jan Scheurich wrote:
> Hi,
>
What if we have 2, 4, 10 HW NICs and a few different destinations for
traffic from VM?
What if we have 2, 4, 10 HW NICs added to balanced OVS bonding and just a
few different packet flows?
What if we have HW NICs with
Not a full review.
General thoughts:
If following conditions are true:
1. We don't need to add new feature to deprecated vhostuser port.
2. We actually don't need to have ability to change ZC config if
vhost-server-path
already configured.
Let me explain this condition:
To change
Hi,
> >> What if we have 2, 4, 10 HW NICs and a few different destinations for
> >> traffic from VM?
> >> What if we have 2, 4, 10 HW NICs added to balanced OVS bonding and just a
> >> few different packet flows?
> >> What if we have HW NICs with small number of TX queues (like VFs) and XPS
>
> Hello Ciara,
> Thanks for the patches.
>
> I did not review the code. But I have few general concerns about number of
> tx descriptors in HW NICs inline.
>
> Best regards, Ilya Maximets.
>
> On 08.12.2017 18:26, Ciara Loftus wrote:
> > Enabled per port like so:
> > ovs-vsctl set Interface
On 14.12.2017 19:26, Kevin Traynor wrote:
> On 12/14/2017 03:30 PM, Ilya Maximets wrote:
>> Hello Ciara,
>> Thanks for the patches.
>>
>> I did not review the code. But I have few general concerns about number
>> of tx descriptors in HW NICs inline.
>>
>> Best regards, Ilya Maximets.
>>
>> On
On 12/14/2017 03:30 PM, Ilya Maximets wrote:
> Hello Ciara,
> Thanks for the patches.
>
> I did not review the code. But I have few general concerns about number
> of tx descriptors in HW NICs inline.
>
> Best regards, Ilya Maximets.
>
> On 08.12.2017 18:26, Ciara Loftus wrote:
>> Enabled per
Hello Ciara,
Thanks for the patches.
I did not review the code. But I have few general concerns about number
of tx descriptors in HW NICs inline.
Best regards, Ilya Maximets.
On 08.12.2017 18:26, Ciara Loftus wrote:
> Enabled per port like so:
> ovs-vsctl set Interface dpdkvhostuserclient0
13 matches
Mail list logo
