> On Jun 27, 2017, at 12:39 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jun 24, 2017 at 10:10:02AM +0800, Justin Pettit wrote:
>>
>>> On Jun 24, 2017, at 2:12 AM, Joe Stringer wrote:
>>>
On 23 June 2017 at 05:38, Russell Bryant wrote:
> On Thu, Jun
On Sat, Jun 24, 2017 at 10:10:02AM +0800, Justin Pettit wrote:
>
> > On Jun 24, 2017, at 2:12 AM, Joe Stringer wrote:
> >
> >> On 23 June 2017 at 05:38, Russell Bryant wrote:
> >>> On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 12:12 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Thu,
> On Jun 24, 2017, at 2:12 AM, Joe Stringer wrote:
>
>> On 23 June 2017 at 05:38, Russell Bryant wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 12:12 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
On Thu, Jun 08, 2017 at 04:36:21AM +0530, Numan Siddique wrote:
Is it possible
On 23 June 2017 at 05:38, Russell Bryant wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 12:12 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 08, 2017 at 04:36:21AM +0530, Numan Siddique wrote:
>>> Is it possible to tag the 2.7 branch with v2.7.1. Recently there were many
>>> back ports to
On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 12:12 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 08, 2017 at 04:36:21AM +0530, Numan Siddique wrote:
>> Is it possible to tag the 2.7 branch with v2.7.1. Recently there were many
>> back ports to 2.7 branch. OVS 2.7 is required for RDO [1] and the RDO
>> community is
On Thu, Jun 08, 2017 at 04:36:21AM +0530, Numan Siddique wrote:
> Is it possible to tag the 2.7 branch with v2.7.1. Recently there were many
> back ports to 2.7 branch. OVS 2.7 is required for RDO [1] and the RDO
> community is expecting a new tag to build the latest OVS 2.7 branch.
It's fine
Hello Ben, Justin,
Is it possible to tag the 2.7 branch with v2.7.1. Recently there were many
back ports to 2.7 branch. OVS 2.7 is required for RDO [1] and the RDO
community is expecting a new tag to build the latest OVS 2.7 branch.
[1] -