> On Jan 27, 2017, at 1:01 PM, Thomas Morin wrote:
>
> Jarno,
>
> 2017-01-27, Jarno Rajahalme:
>> Cleanest solution would be to use the new clone action for the datapath,
>> which, if important, we could also backport to OVS 2.5.x.
>
> Yes, clone is indeed much more
> On Jan 27, 2017, at 7:40 AM, Thomas Morin wrote:
>
> Hi Jarno, all,
>
> Sorry for being slow to react.
> I'd be glad to test a fix, but I'm unclear if there is one ready to be tested.
>
> Perhasp "xlate: Recirculate also when MPLS POP is implicit." but I'm not sure
Hi Jarno, all,
Sorry for being slow to react.
I'd be glad to test a fix, but I'm unclear if there is one ready to be
tested.
Perhasp "xlate: Recirculate also when MPLS POP is implicit." but I'm not
sure there has been a follow-up to the discuss between you and Ben?
Or is the new clone action
I sent a patch to do this fix on OVS master. IMO we should also make the
datapath more flexible so that it would be able to POP back to IP after PUSH
actions on an IP packet in the same action list. But that will not make it to
OVS 2.7.
I would appreciate if Thomas could apply the and test!
On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 9:02 AM, Jarno Rajahalme wrote:
>
> On Dec 13, 2016, at 3:32 PM, Takashi YAMAMOTO wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 6:49 PM, Thomas Morin
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Jarno,
>>
>> 2016-12-10, Jarno Rajahalme:
>>
>> On
On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 6:49 PM, Thomas Morin
wrote:
> Hi Jarno,
>
> 2016-12-10, Jarno Rajahalme:
>
> On Dec 9, 2016, at 7:04 AM, Thomas Morin wrote:
>
>
> 2016-12-09, Thomas Morin:
>
> In the same setup as the one on which the bug was observed,
Hi Jarno,
2016-12-10, Jarno Rajahalme:
On Dec 9, 2016, at 7:04 AM, Thomas Morin > wrote:
2016-12-09, Thomas Morin:
In the same setup as the one on which the bug was observed, [...]
I was confused, I in fact tested the patch
> On Dec 9, 2016, at 7:04 AM, Thomas Morin wrote:
>
> 2016-12-09, Thomas Morin:
>> In the same setup as the one on which the bug was observed, [...]
>
> I was confused, I in fact tested the patch (branch-2.5) on a /different/
> setup as the one on which we hit the
2016-12-09, Thomas Morin:
In the same setup as the one on which the bug was observed, [...]
I was confused, I in fact tested the patch (branch-2.5) on a /different/
setup as the one on which we hit the bug, using MPLS over a GRE tunnel
port, rather than plain MPLS over an eth port.
Sorry if
Hi Jarno,
2016-12-03, Jarno Rajahalme:
I sent a patch to fix this on OVS master. After it is reviewed I’ll
backport it to branch-2.5 (it only needs trivial fixes to apply, so
you may want to try that as well).
I tested the patch (on branch-2.5) and have mixed results.
In the same setup as
2016-12-03, Jarno Rajahalme:
I sent a patch to fix this on OVS master. After it is reviewed I’ll
backport it to branch-2.5 (it only needs trivial fixes to apply, so
you may want to try that as well).
Thank you very much.
I'll try it this week.
Best,
-Thomas
On Dec 1, 2016, at 5:57 PM,
I sent a patch to fix this on OVS master. After it is reviewed I’ll backport it
to branch-2.5 (it only needs trivial fixes to apply, so you may want to try
that as well).
Jarno
> On Dec 1, 2016, at 5:57 PM, Jarno Rajahalme wrote:
>
>
>> On Nov 30, 2016, at 8:50 PM, Ben
Hi Jarno,
2016-12-02, Jarno Rajahalme:
2016-11-29T14:44:40.126Z|1|odp_util(revalidator45)|WARN|commit_set_ipv4_action
assert would fail
2016-11-29T14:44:40.126Z|2|odp_util(revalidator45)|WARN|
base_flow:
hi,
On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 10:57 AM, Jarno Rajahalme wrote:
>
> > On Nov 30, 2016, at 8:50 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 06:58:57PM -0800, Jarno Rajahalme wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Nov 30, 2016, at 8:41 AM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> >>>
>
> On Nov 30, 2016, at 8:50 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>
> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 06:58:57PM -0800, Jarno Rajahalme wrote:
>>
>>> On Nov 30, 2016, at 8:41 AM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 12:05:46PM +0100, Thomas Morin wrote:
Hi Ben,
On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 06:58:57PM -0800, Jarno Rajahalme wrote:
>
> > On Nov 30, 2016, at 8:41 AM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 12:05:46PM +0100, Thomas Morin wrote:
> >> Hi Ben,
> >>
> >> 2016-11-30, Ben Pfaff:
> >>> Do you have any idea what in your
> On Nov 30, 2016, at 8:41 AM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>
> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 12:05:46PM +0100, Thomas Morin wrote:
>> Hi Ben,
>>
>> 2016-11-30, Ben Pfaff:
>>> Do you have any idea what in your OpenFlow pipeline might do that,
>>> i.e. is there anything especially tricky in the
On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 12:05:46PM +0100, Thomas Morin wrote:
> Hi Ben,
>
> 2016-11-30, Ben Pfaff:
> >Do you have any idea what in your OpenFlow pipeline might do that,
> >i.e. is there anything especially tricky in the OpenFlow flows?
> >
> > Are you willing to show us your OpenFlow flow table?
Hi Thomas,
On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 12:05:46PM +0100, Thomas Morin wrote:
> Hi Ben,
>
> 2016-11-30, Ben Pfaff:
> >Do you have any idea what in your OpenFlow pipeline might do that,
> >i.e. is there anything especially tricky in the OpenFlow flows?
> >
> > Are you willing to show us your OpenFlow
Hi Ben,
2016-11-30, Ben Pfaff:
Do you have any idea what in your OpenFlow pipeline might do that,
i.e. is there anything especially tricky in the OpenFlow flows?
>
> Are you willing to show us your OpenFlow flow table?
The setup involves three OVS bridges connected with patch-ports: br-int
20 matches
Mail list logo