Re: [ovs-dev] master now "frozen" for forking

It actually makes a lot of sense. Please ignore my other comment on master about having the IPv6 RA patch on 2.9, doing it this way, we effectively have it already. On Fri, Jan 5, 2018 at 5:51 PM Ben Pfaff wrote: > On Fri, Jan 05, 2018 at 03:58:08PM +, Stokes, Ian wrote: > >

Re: [ovs-dev] master now "frozen" for forking

> Hello everyone. We are at the point in the release cycle where > traditionally we would fork a branch from master for release. We have > tried a slightly different approach a few times and I'd like to propose > that we do it again. Instead of forking immediately, I propose that we > "freeze"

[ovs-dev] master now "frozen" for forking

Hello everyone. We are at the point in the release cycle where traditionally we would fork a branch from master for release. We have tried a slightly different approach a few times and I'd like to propose that we do it again. Instead of forking immediately, I propose that we "freeze" master so