> On 11/13/2017 09:42 PM, Stokes, Ian wrote:
> >> rxq_cycle_sort summed the latest cycles from each queue for sorting.
> >> While each comparison was correct with the latest cycles, the cycles
> >> could change between calls to rxq_cycle_sort. In order to use
> >> consistent values through each
On 11/13/2017 09:42 PM, Stokes, Ian wrote:
>> rxq_cycle_sort summed the latest cycles from each queue for sorting.
>> While each comparison was correct with the latest cycles, the cycles could
>> change between calls to rxq_cycle_sort. In order to use consistent values
>> through each call to
On 11/13/2017 09:42 PM, Stokes, Ian wrote:
>> rxq_cycle_sort summed the latest cycles from each queue for sorting.
>> While each comparison was correct with the latest cycles, the cycles could
>> change between calls to rxq_cycle_sort. In order to use consistent values
>> through each call to
> rxq_cycle_sort summed the latest cycles from each queue for sorting.
> While each comparison was correct with the latest cycles, the cycles could
> change between calls to rxq_cycle_sort. In order to use consistent values
> through each call to rxq_cycle_sort, sum the cycles prior to
>
