Ben Pfaff writes:
> On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 08:57:23AM -0400, Aaron Conole wrote:
>> I think the issue here on the bot side is that the compiler is not able
>> to deal with this initialization semantic. I'll follow up and get it
>> fixed.
>
> I sent a fix yesterday:
>
On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 08:57:23AM -0400, Aaron Conole wrote:
> I think the issue here on the bot side is that the compiler is not able
> to deal with this initialization semantic. I'll follow up and get it
> fixed.
I sent a fix yesterday:
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/975494/
0-day Robot writes:
> Bleep bloop. Greetings Ben Pfaff, I am a robot and I have tried out your
> patch.
> Thanks for your contribution.
>
> I encountered some error that I wasn't expecting. See the details below.
>
>
> build:
> /bin/sh ./libtool --tag=CC --mode=compile gcc -std=gnu99
Bleep bloop. Greetings Ben Pfaff, I am a robot and I have tried out your patch.
Thanks for your contribution.
I encountered some error that I wasn't expecting. See the details below.
build:
/bin/sh ./libtool --tag=CC --mode=compile gcc -std=gnu99 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I.
-I ./include -I
