Re: [ovs-dev] (no subject)

2018-05-30 Thread info
Brauchen Sie einen Investor? Benötigen Sie geschäftliche oder private Kredite? Wir geben Darlehen an jeden einzelnen und Unternehmen mit 3% Zinssatz jährlich. Für weitere Informationen, kontaktieren Sie uns per e-Mail Dank ich hoffe, von Ihnen zu hören

[ovs-dev] Recursos Humanos / Dirección Extratégica

2018-05-30 Thread Logre el rendimiento corporativo
El participante será capaz de: - Analizar la necesidad y ventajas de conocer la misión, visión y valores corporativos. - Conocer cuáles son las cuatro barreras fundamentales que impiden el establecimiento de una estrategia en nuestras organizaciones. -Saber que variables posibilitan una

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH v2] ovndb-servers.ocf: add support for managing cluster

2018-05-30 Thread Han Zhou
On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 3:27 PM, aginwala wrote: > > > On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 2:52 PM, Han Zhou wrote: > >> >> >> On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 11:40 PM, Numan Siddique >> wrote: >> > >> > On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 5:31 AM, aginwala wrote: >> > >> > > Thanks for the Review. >> > > >> > > On Wed, May

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH v2] ovndb-servers.ocf: add support for managing cluster

2018-05-30 Thread aginwala
On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 2:52 PM, Han Zhou wrote: > > > On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 11:40 PM, Numan Siddique > wrote: > > > > On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 5:31 AM, aginwala wrote: > > > > > Thanks for the Review. > > > > > > On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 11:36 AM, Numan Siddique > > > wrote: > > > > > >> On

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH v2] ovndb-servers.ocf: add support for managing cluster

2018-05-30 Thread Han Zhou
On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 11:40 PM, Numan Siddique wrote: > > On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 5:31 AM, aginwala wrote: > > > Thanks for the Review. > > > > On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 11:36 AM, Numan Siddique > > wrote: > > > >> On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 12:13 AM, aginwala wrote: > >> > >> > using pacemaker so

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH v2] ovndb-servers.ocf: add support for managing cluster

2018-05-30 Thread aginwala
Sounds good! Addressed the comments in V3 @ https://patchwork.ozlabs. org/patch/923040/ . Please help review the same and let me know further. On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 11:40 PM, Numan Siddique wrote: > > > On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 5:31 AM, aginwala wrote: > >> Thanks for the Review. >> >> On

[ovs-dev] [PATCH v3] ovndb-servers.ocf: add LB support for managing ovsdb cluster

2018-05-30 Thread aginwala
using pacemaker so that controllers can be placed in different fault domains. Signed-off-by: aginwala --- ovn/utilities/ovndb-servers.ocf | 82 - 1 file changed, 64 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) diff --git a/ovn/utilities/ovndb-servers.ocf

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH v3] Avoid tunneling for VLAN packets redirected to a gateway chassis

2018-05-30 Thread Russell Bryant
One more general question: a major difference when doing the redirect to the gateway via a VLAN vs a geneve tunnel is the lack of metadata. You've demonstrated how it's easy enough to identify the network (the VLAN ID + the port it arrived on). How about the logical input / output IDs? What

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH v3] Avoid tunneling for VLAN packets redirected to a gateway chassis

2018-05-30 Thread Russell Bryant
On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 7:33 AM, wrote: > From: venkata anil > > When a vm on a vlan tenant network sends traffic to an external network, > it is tunneled from host chassis to gateway chassis. In the earlier > discussion [1], Russel (also in his doc [2]) suggested if we can figure > out a way

Re: [ovs-dev] OVS-DPDK public meeting

2018-05-30 Thread Kevin Traynor
Minutes of meeting Wed 30th May. Attendees: Eelco, Ian, Johan, Anders, Tiago, Shahaf, Armita, Kevin === GENERAL === - OVS 2.10 -- Dates: Feature Freeze, code freeze, release. http://docs.openvswitch.org/en/latest/internals/release-process/#release-scheduling -- Branch due to take place

[ovs-dev] Dirección y gestión hotelera

2018-05-30 Thread Formación directiva
Maestra en Direccin y Gestin Hotelera

[ovs-dev] [PATCH] ovsdb-idl: Remove unnecessary code in track clear.

2018-05-30 Thread Han Zhou
In ovsdb_idl_db_track_clear(), it needs to free the deleted row. However, it unnecessary to call ovsdb_idl_row_clear_old(), because this has been called in ovsdb_idl_row_destroy(). It is also confusing because it is called only if: if (ovsdb_idl_row_is_orphan(row)) This is contradict with the

[ovs-dev] SEO Service Solutions

2018-05-30 Thread jimmybwilliams8
Hi there, Jimmy here I have been in Link Building business for 5 years, have 9k website with good metrics until DA72 and have 32 niches available, like automotive, business, health, tech . . .until wedding. So if you need some service in this industry, I can offer some of my services like: 1.

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH v1] netdev-dpdk: Enable HW_CRC_STRIP for virtual functions.

2018-05-30 Thread Stokes, Ian
> > Hi, > > > > I did all my testing with DPDK 17.11.2 and the following OVS commit > > (patch doesn't apply cleanly to master): > > cferrite@silpixa00393943:~/ovs$ git show --summary commit > > 6b71df2fc06921758798e41833d67d9daf647d19 > > Author: Kevin Traynor > > Date: Wed Apr 25 12:20:53

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH v1] netdev-dpdk: Enable HW_CRC_STRIP for virtual functions.

2018-05-30 Thread Stokes, Ian
> Hi, > > I did all my testing with DPDK 17.11.2 and the following OVS commit (patch > doesn't apply cleanly to master): > cferrite@silpixa00393943:~/ovs$ git show --summary commit > 6b71df2fc06921758798e41833d67d9daf647d19 > Author: Kevin Traynor > Date: Wed Apr 25 12:20:53 2018 +0100 > >

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH v2 1/1] netdev-dpdk: Handle ENOTSUP for rte_eth_dev_set_mtu.

2018-05-30 Thread Stokes, Ian
> Hi Ian, > > I did all my testing with DPDK 17.11.2 and the following OVS commit (HEAD > of master at the time of testing): > cferrite@silpixa00393943:~/ovs$ git show --summary commit > 55b259471719ceca1f0083bdd6a5f8c3e7690bae > Author: Numan Siddique > Date: Thu May 24 17:45:53 2018 +0200 >

Re: [ovs-dev] [RFC PATCH v1] dpdk: Support both shared and per port mempools.

2018-05-30 Thread Stokes, Ian
> On 05/30/2018 11:25 AM, Stokes, Ian wrote: > >>> - mp_name, mp); > >>> -/* Ensure this reused mempool will not be freed. */ > >>> -dpdk_mp_do_not_free(mp); > >> The mempool you are about to reuse could have a refcount of 0 and > >> about to be freed by

Re: [ovs-dev] [RFC PATCH v1] dpdk: Support both shared and per port mempools.

2018-05-30 Thread Kevin Traynor
On 05/30/2018 11:25 AM, Stokes, Ian wrote: >>> - mp_name, mp); >>> -/* Ensure this reused mempool will not be freed. */ >>> -dpdk_mp_do_not_free(mp); >> The mempool you are about to reuse could have a refcount of 0 and about to >> be freed by a sweep. So

Re: [ovs-dev] [RFC PATCH v1] dpdk: Support both shared and per port mempools.

2018-05-30 Thread Stokes, Ian
> On 05/18/2018 03:30 PM, Ian Stokes wrote: > > This commit re-introduces the concept of shared mempools as the > > default memory model for DPDK devices. Per port mempools are still > > available but must be enabled explicitly by a user. > > > > OVS previously used a shared mempool model for

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH v3] OVS-DPDK: Change "dpdk-socket-mem" default value.

2018-05-30 Thread Govindharajan, Hariprasad
> -Original Message- > From: ovs-dev-boun...@openvswitch.org [mailto:ovs-dev- > boun...@openvswitch.org] On Behalf Of O Mahony, Billy > Sent: Wednesday, May 9, 2018 11:14 AM > To: d...@openvswitch.org > Cc: Rybka, MarcinX > Subject: [ovs-dev] [PATCH v3] OVS-DPDK: Change

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH] rhel: add missing man to ovs fedora spec file

2018-05-30 Thread Roi Dayan
On Tue, May 29, 2018, 17:54 Lorenzo Bianconi wrote: > Fix following compilation error running 'make rpm-fedora' > > error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found: >/usr/share/man/man1/ovs-sim.1.gz > > RPM build errors: > Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found: >

Re: [ovs-dev] [RFC v7 00/13] Support multi-segment mbufs

2018-05-30 Thread Lam, Tiago
Hi Ciara, Thank you for the review! I've replied to some of the emails, which could do with some explanation. I agree with most comments though, and will include fixes for the next iteration. On 28/05/2018 16:39, Loftus, Ciara wrote:> > Hi Tiago, > > Thanks for the patch. I've reviewed the

Re: [ovs-dev] [RFC v7 06/13] dp-packet: Handle multi-seg mbufs in put*() funcs.

2018-05-30 Thread Lam, Tiago
On 28/05/2018 16:42, Loftus, Ciara wrote: >> >> The dp_packet_put*() function - dp_packet_put_uninit(), dp_packet_put() >> and dp_packet_put_zeros() - are, in their current implementation, >> operating on the data buffer of a dp_packet as if it were contiguous, >> which in the case of

Re: [ovs-dev] [RFC v7 05/13] dp-packet: Handle multi-seg mbufs in helper funcs.

2018-05-30 Thread Lam, Tiago
On 28/05/2018 16:41, Loftus, Ciara wrote: >> >> Most helper functions in dp-packet assume that the data held by a >> dp_packet is contiguous, and perform operations such as pointer >> arithmetic under that assumption. However, with the introduction of >> multi-segment mbufs, where data is

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH v2] ovndb-servers.ocf: add support for managing cluster

2018-05-30 Thread Numan Siddique
On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 5:31 AM, aginwala wrote: > Thanks for the Review. > > On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 11:36 AM, Numan Siddique > wrote: > >> On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 12:13 AM, aginwala wrote: >> >> > using pacemaker so that controllers can be placed in different fault >> > domains. >> > >> >