Hi Han,
Appreciate your feedback.
Please find the reply inline.
Thanks
Regards,
Ankur
From: Han Zhou
Sent: Friday, October 19, 2018 5:17 PM
To: Ankur Sharma
Cc: Mark Michelson ; ovs-dev@openvswitch.org
Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] OVN based distributed virtual routing for VLAN backed
networks
On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 3:09 PM Ankur Sharma
wrote:
>
> Hi Han,
>
> Thanks a lot for review.
> Please find my replies inline.
>
> Please feel free to put forth more points for discussion.
>
> Thanks
>
> Regards,
> Ankur
>
>
>
> From: Han Zhou
> Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2018 11:55 PM
> To:
Hi Guru,
Thanks for taking a look.
Please find the detailed explanation of problem statement inline.
Thanks
Regards,
Ankur
From: Guru Shetty
Sent: Friday, October 19, 2018 9:35 AM
To: Ankur Sharma
Cc: ovs-dev
Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] OVN based distributed virtual routing for VLAN backed
Hi Han,
Thanks a lot for review.
Please find my replies inline.
Please feel free to put forth more points for discussion.
Thanks
Regards,
Ankur
From: Han Zhou
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2018 11:55 PM
To: Ankur Sharma
Cc: Mark Michelson ; ovs-dev@openvswitch.org
Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] OVN
- This mail is in HTML. Some elements may be ommited in plain text. -
Good day,
Firstly, I apologize for sending you this sensitive information via e-mail
instead of a Certified/Post-mail. It is understandable that you might be a
little bit apprehensive because you do not know me, But I have a
Can't you use CreateProcess or _popen to trigger the script/function directly?
Thanks,
Sairam
On 10/8/18, 4:28 PM, "ovs-dev-boun...@openvswitch.org on behalf of Alin
Gabriel Serdean" wrote:
On Windows 2016 LTSC(RTM) the Container feature and Hyper-V feature both had
DCOM API to add
Hi Alin,
Since the hns.psm1 isn't officially supported by Microsoft, is it safe to use
the script as part of the OVS repo? Also, "Invoke-HNSRequest" isn't officially
documented at this time. I understand that this is an RFC, but do you know if
Microsoft plans to finalize this api? If not, I
Hi Alin,
Thanks for the patch. Can't we have the HNSHelper.psm1 be part of the OVS.psm1
directory?
Thanks,
Sairam
On 10/8/18, 4:27 PM, "ovs-dev-boun...@openvswitch.org on behalf of Alin
Gabriel Serdean" wrote:
This patch adds the new powershell module HNSHelper.psm1 to the OVS windows
[adding the list back]
I don't see this error on master:
blp@sigabrt:~/nicira/ovs/_build(0)$ make -j10 check-oftest OFTFLAGS='-T
actions.ForwardAll'
make all-recursive
make[1]: Entering directory '/home/blp/nicira/ovs/_build'
Making all in datapath
make[2]: Entering directory
Hi Eelco,
Thanks for your review comments. Please see my response below. The
patch-set got merged earlier today. We will address your comments in
subsequent bug-fix patches.
On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 1:27 AM Eelco Chaudron wrote:
>
>
>
> On 18 Oct 2018, at 18:13, Sriharsha Basavapatna via dev
On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 04:07:42PM +, Stokes, Ian wrote:
> Hi Ben,
>
> The following changes since commit 22595b3b763b9eaaf661eec40cc6926557c8696b:
>
> Revert "Work around Python/C JSON unicode differences" (2018-10-15 14:44:18
> -0700)
>
> are available in the git repository at:
>
>
On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 04:07:28PM +, Stokes, Ian wrote:
> Hi Ben,
>
> The following changes since commit 57924fc91c899ee955e30b36fed92a27a73b2ac1:
>
> revalidator: Rebalance offloaded flows based on the pps rate (2018-10-19
> 11:27:52 +0200)
>
> are available in the git repository at:
>
On Tue, 16 Oct 2018 at 15:43, Ankur Sharma wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We have done some effort in evaluating usage of OVN for
> Distributed Virtual Routing (DVR) for vlan backed networks.
>
Would you mind explaining the above statement with a lot of details? I
would like to understand the problem well
Hi Ben,
The following changes since commit 1dea6844708fb4b14024ff7dbdf78c9aa090db80:
test-hash: Fix unaligned pointer value error. (2018-10-16 15:21:06 -0700)
are available in the git repository at:
https://github.com/istokes/ovs dpdk_merge_2_6
for you to fetch changes up to
Hi Ben,
The following changes since commit da5fe1070e8083bf98f688cf0368540e592bed1d:
test-hash: Fix unaligned pointer value error. (2018-10-16 15:21:38 -0700)
are available in the git repository at:
https://github.com/istokes/ovs dpdk_merge_2_7
for you to fetch changes up to
Hi Ben,
The following changes since commit 597df6459f3b114905773c4f4dcf7e5f511cb808:
tests: Fix conntrack tests expected results. (2018-10-15 15:25:31 -0700)
are available in the git repository at:
https://github.com/istokes/ovs dpdk_merge_2_8
for you to fetch changes up to
Hi Ben,
The following changes since commit bcd2fa997da2173fa4075af50474d1278e7d4396:
Revert "Work around Python/C JSON unicode differences" (2018-10-15 14:44:37
-0700)
are available in the git repository at:
https://github.com/istokes/ovs dpdk_merge_2_9
for you to fetch changes up to
Hi Ben,
The following changes since commit 22595b3b763b9eaaf661eec40cc6926557c8696b:
Revert "Work around Python/C JSON unicode differences" (2018-10-15 14:44:18
-0700)
are available in the git repository at:
https://github.com/istokes/ovs dpdk_merge_2_10
for you to fetch changes up to
Hi Ben,
The following changes since commit 57924fc91c899ee955e30b36fed92a27a73b2ac1:
revalidator: Rebalance offloaded flows based on the pps rate (2018-10-19
11:27:52 +0200)
are available in the git repository at:
https://github.com/istokes/ovs dpdk_merge
for you to fetch changes up to
Hi Simon,
You might have missed my general comments email before you committed the
patchset to master.
Just now I also sent my full review, and it looks like there is one
nasty memory trashing one in 3/3 which need fixing. It’s the
x2nrealloc() always allocating 1 entry, but we write to
On 18 Oct 2018, at 18:13, Sriharsha Basavapatna via dev wrote:
This is the third patch in the patch-set to support dynamic
rebalancing
of offloaded flows.
The dynamic rebalancing functionality is implemented in this patch.
The
ukeys that are not scheduled for deletion are obtained and passed
On 18 Oct 2018, at 18:13, Sriharsha Basavapatna via dev wrote:
This is the second patch in the patch-set to support dynamic
rebalancing
of offloaded flows.
The packets-per-second (pps) rate for each flow is computed in the
context
of revalidator threads when the flow stats are retrieved. The
On 18 Oct 2018, at 18:13, Sriharsha Basavapatna via dev wrote:
This is the first patch in the patch-set to support dynamic
rebalancing
of offloaded flows.
The patch detects OOR condition on a netdev port when ENOSPC error is
returned by TC-Flower while adding a flow rule. A new structure is
No need to waste time for fields checking in case DBG disabled.
Additionally sequence of prints replaced with single print
to avoid output interrupting by other log messages.
Signed-off-by: Ilya Maximets
---
lib/netdev-dpdk.c | 95 ++-
1 file changed,
This is useful for understanding which flows offloaded to
which ports.
Code refactored a bit to reduce number of casts.
Signed-off-by: Ilya Maximets
---
lib/netdev-dpdk.c | 26 +-
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/netdev-dpdk.c
Data pointed by cmap node must not be freed while iterating.
ovsrcu_postpone should be used instead.
CC: Finn Christensen
Fixes: e8a2b5bf92bb ("netdev-dpdk: implement flow offload with rte flow")
Signed-off-by: Ilya Maximets
---
lib/dpif-netdev.c | 2 +-
lib/netdev-dpdk.c | 2 +-
2 files
Ilya Maximets (3):
dpif-netdev: Fix cmap node use after free on flow disassociation.
netdev-dpdk: Print port name in offload API messages.
netdev-dpdk: Dump flow patterns only if debug enabled.
lib/dpif-netdev.c | 2 +-
lib/netdev-dpdk.c | 123
> On 10/19/2018 12:40 PM, Ian Stokes wrote:
> > Modify travis linux build script to use the latest DPDK stable release
> > 17.11.4. Update docs for latest DPDK stable releases.
> >
>
> Acked-by: Kevin Traynor
>
Thanks Kevin.
Ian
___
dev mailing list
Remove note regarding zero-copy compatibility with QEMU >= 2.7.
When zero-copy was introduced to OVS it was incompatible with QEMU >=
2.7. This issue has since been fixed in DPDK with commit
803aeecef123 ("vhost: fix dequeue zero copy with virtio1") and
backported to DPDK LTS branches. Remove the
On 10/19/2018 12:03 PM, Stokes, Ian wrote:
>> On 09/13/2018 01:43 PM, Ian Stokes wrote:
>>> Modify travis linux build script to use the latest DPDK stable release
>>> 17.11.4. Update docs for latest DPDK stable releases.
>>>
>>
>> I didn't see a specific branch-2.9 patch, and it doesn't apply due
On 10/19/2018 12:40 PM, Ian Stokes wrote:
> Modify travis linux build script to use the latest
> DPDK stable release 17.11.4. Update docs for latest
> DPDK stable releases.
>
Acked-by: Kevin Traynor
> Signed-off-by: Ian Stokes
> ---
> .travis/linux-build.sh | 2 +-
>
Ilya Maximets writes:
> Hi Aaron.
>
> What do you think about adding BSD build check to 0-day robot?
> It'll be cool to run, for example, FreeBSD VM for checking to
> cover bugs like this:
> https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/984844/
>
> netdev-bsd and many other BSD related code is not
> > On 09/13/2018 01:43 PM, Ian Stokes wrote:
> > > Modify travis linux build script to use the latest DPDK stable
> > > release 17.11.4. Update docs for latest DPDK stable releases.
> > >
> >
> > I didn't see a specific branch-2.9 patch, and it doesn't apply due to
> > the docs having moved. If
Modify travis linux build script to use the latest
DPDK stable release 17.11.4. Update docs for latest
DPDK stable releases.
Signed-off-by: Ian Stokes
---
.travis/linux-build.sh | 2 +-
Documentation/faq/releases.rst | 4 ++--
Documentation/intro/install/dpdk.rst
> On 09/13/2018 02:29 PM, Ian Stokes wrote:
> > Modify travis linux build script to use the latest DPDK stable release
> > 16.11.8. Update docs for latest DPDK stable releases.
> >
>
> Acked-by: Kevin Traynor
>
Thanks Kevin.
Ian
___
dev mailing list
> On 09/13/2018 01:43 PM, Ian Stokes wrote:
> > Modify travis linux build script to use the latest DPDK stable release
> > 17.11.4. Update docs for latest DPDK stable releases.
> >
>
> I didn't see a specific branch-2.9 patch, and it doesn't apply due to
> the docs having moved. If you are
On 09/13/2018 01:43 PM, Ian Stokes wrote:
> Modify travis linux build script to use the latest
> DPDK stable release 17.11.4. Update docs for latest
> DPDK stable releases.
>
I didn't see a specific branch-2.9 patch, and it doesn't apply due to
the docs having moved. If you are intending it for
On 09/13/2018 02:29 PM, Ian Stokes wrote:
> Modify travis linux build script to use the latest
> DPDK stable release 16.11.8. Update docs for latest
> DPDK stable releases.
>
Acked-by: Kevin Traynor
> Signed-off-by: Ian Stokes
> ---
> .travis/linux-build.sh | 2 +-
>
> On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 02:39:32PM -0300, Flavio Leitner wrote:
>> Ian, I am afraid that the issue might be local and we most probably can
>> fix with a follow up patch later, so if others are happy with the patchset,
>> please go ahead. I can see this only in the mid of next week.
>
> The
On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 09:43:11PM +0530, Sriharsha Basavapatna via dev wrote:
> With the current OVS offload design, when an offload-device fails to add a
> flow rule and returns an error, OVS adds the rule to the kernel datapath.
> The flow gets processed by the kernel datapath for the entire
Unsubscribe Here
Do you wish to get your Bitcoin Doubled, Are you a Bitcoin Miner, Bitcoin
Investor OR Want to invest in Bitcoin???.
Here is a reliable profit making Bitcoin Investment/Mining
On 18 Oct 2018, at 13:17, nusid...@redhat.com wrote:
From: Numan Siddique
We see the below trace when a port is added to a bridge and the
configured
controller is down
0x7fb002f8b207 in raise () from /lib64/libc.so.6
0x7fb002f8c8f8 in abort () from /lib64/libc.so.6
Hi Ankur, Mark,
Please find my comments inline below.
(I will spend more time to understand the change for the NAT case. )
Thanks,
Han
On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 4:40 PM Ankur Sharma
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> As per our discussion in the IRC meeting today, i have added all the
diagrams in following
43 matches
Mail list logo
