Befinden Sie sich in einer Finanzkrise? Benötigen Sie einen Kredit, um Ihr
Zuhause zu refinanzieren oder Ihr Geschäft auszubauen? Benötigen Sie einen
Kredit, um dringende Schulden zu begleichen und bei einer Bank zu bleiben?
Benötigen Sie einen Kredit, um Ihre Rechnungen zu bezahlen?
From: Han Zhou
When adding a new chassis, if there is an old chassis with same IP
existed in Encap table, it is allowed to be added today. However,
allowing it to be added results in problems:
1. The new chassis cannot work because none of the other chassises
are able to create tunnel to it,
Hi all,
That commit was only to get the shared libraries. It doesn't need the
static libraries.
Martin
On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 2:22 PM Flavio Leitner wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 11, 2018 at 11:04:01AM -0800, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 11, 2018 at 04:32:40PM +0100, Timothy Redaelli wrote:
> > >
On Sun, Nov 11, 2018 at 11:04:01AM -0800, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 11, 2018 at 04:32:40PM +0100, Timothy Redaelli wrote:
> > Hi,
> > from commit bc4fd439586f ("rhel: Ship ovs shared libraries, fedora")
> > the openvswitch-devel subpackage (in openvswitch-fedora.spec)
> > stated to include
Signed-off-by: Ashish Varma
---
Documentation/tutorials/ovs-conntrack.rst | 20 ++--
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/tutorials/ovs-conntrack.rst
b/Documentation/tutorials/ovs-conntrack.rst
index 07ea998..a86288f 100644
---
Calling it from net_dev_init doesn't look clean.
If you will see who is calling 'dev_add_offload' you will find out that
there are couple of modules that doing that except of the 8021q. so either
all modules should add offload from net_dev_init or stay with the current
model where each module adds
Hi Alin,
Thanks for the patch. Shashank is giving it a run. How do we prevent this issue
in the future?
For starters, I think we need to consolidate the usage under nl_* functions to
ensure it's not doing something differently in vport_*.
We need to look into investing in the test framework
Looks good to me, thanks.
Reviewed-by: Yifeng Sun
On Thu, Nov 8, 2018 at 9:39 PM Ben Pfaff wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Ben Pfaff
> ---
> include/openvswitch/meta-flow.h | 4 ++--
> ovn/utilities/ovn-sbctl.8.in| 2 +-
> ovn/utilities/ovn-trace.8.xml | 2 +-
> vswitchd/vswitch.xml
On Sun, 11 Nov 2018 at 21:02, Ankur Sharma wrote:
> Hi Guru,
>
> Thanks for spending time in understanding the proposal and drafting your
> understanding as well.
> Thanks Numan for pitching in.
>
> Some comments (trying to keep them as brief as possible).
>
> a. On a high level, we are trying
Fixes:
https://github.com/openvswitch/ovs-issues/issues/164
Signed-off-by: Alin Gabriel Serdean
---
lib/dpif-netlink.c | 58 +-
1 file changed, 57 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/lib/dpif-netlink.c b/lib/dpif-netlink.c
index
Thanks for working to make OVN better.
I've only glanced at this series. At a glance, it looks to me like it
should be a single patch, because we usually change the schema,
implement the change in ovn-northd, and add commands to ovn-nbctl to
make it useful in a single patch.
Please add a NEWS
I'm having some trouble reproducing this... I'd like to, though,
because the Raft implementation needs to be reliable. Do you have any
more advice?
On Mon, Nov 05, 2018 at 04:28:22PM -0800, Ashish Varma wrote:
> Not sure if this is reported before. I am seeing failure (not always) at
> the
> On Thu, Nov 08, 2018 at 02:40:12PM +, Stokes, Ian wrote:
> > > On Thu, Nov 08, 2018 at 02:16:15PM +, Stokes, Ian wrote:
> > > > > On 06.11.2018 17:31, Stokes, Ian wrote:
> > > > > >> On 18.10.2018 16:29, Ilya Maximets wrote:
> > > > > >>> vhost ports are not DPDK eth ports and has no
On Sun, Nov 11, 2018 at 11:04:17AM +0100, Timothy Redaelli wrote:
> In commit d5cc46e3d185 ("ipsec: Use @PYTHON@ directly instead of
> "/usr/bin/env python"") ovs-monitor-ipsec is installed in bin directory,
> but it's supposed to be installed in script directory.
>
> This commit removes also the
On Sun, Nov 11, 2018 at 11:04:33AM +0100, Timothy Redaelli wrote:
> Commit d5cc46e3d185 ("ipsec: Use @PYTHON@ directly instead of "/usr/bin/env
> python"") introduced ovs-monitor-ipsec.in that generates
> ovs-monitor-ipsec.
>
> This commit adds ovs-monitor-ipsec to ipsec/.gitignore.
>
> Fixes:
On Sun, Nov 11, 2018 at 11:13:50AM +0100, Timothy Redaelli wrote:
> Currently the split package for ipsec is named
> openvswitch-openvswitch-ipsec, but it should be named openvswitch-ipsec.
>
> This commit changes the spec file in order to have the IPsec package as
> openvswitch-ipsec instead of
On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 01:34:11PM +0300, Ilya Maximets wrote:
> This fixes travis distcheck:
>
> ERROR: files left in build directory after distclean:
> ./ipsec/ovs-monitor-ipsec
> make[1]: *** [distcleancheck] Error 1
>
> CC: Timothy Redaelli
> Fixes: d5cc46e3d185 ("ipsec: Use @PYTHON@
On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 03:54:12PM +0100, Lorenzo Bianconi wrote:
> > Buffered packets are always packets created by 'dp_packet_clone_data()'
> > i.e. they are malloced. It's not enough to free the packet data,
> > dp_packet structure must be freed too. 'dp_packet_delete()' will take
> > care of
On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 04:04:20PM +0100, Lorenzo Bianconi wrote:
> > 'destroy_buffered_packets()' removes the hmap node which was
> > already removed by 'HMAP_FOR_EACH_POP()' producing following
> > crash log:
> >
> > Invalid read of size 8
> > at 0x134EDB: hmap_remove (hmap.h:287)
>
Thanks a lot Ian!
On 12 Nov 2018, at 17:16, Stokes, Ian wrote:
>> On 12.11.2018 12:26, Eelco Chaudron wrote:
>>> When the netdev link flags are changed, !NETDEV_UP, the DPDK ports are
>>> not actually going down. This is causing problems for people trying to
>>> bring down a bond member. The
> On 12.11.2018 12:26, Eelco Chaudron wrote:
> > When the netdev link flags are changed, !NETDEV_UP, the DPDK ports are
> > not actually going down. This is causing problems for people trying to
> > bring down a bond member. The bond link is no longer being used to
> > receive or transmit traffic,
Beste
vriend ,
Ik neem contact met u op om
te helpen bij het claimen van de borg van (veertien miljoen en
vijfhonderdduizend Amerikaanse dollars) om inbeslagname te voorkomen.
Mijn overleden cliënt, die
dezelfde achternaam met u deelt, heeft een borg van veertien miljoen dollar,
> Buffered packets are always packets created by 'dp_packet_clone_data()'
> i.e. they are malloced. It's not enough to free the packet data,
> dp_packet structure must be freed too. 'dp_packet_delete()' will take
> care of that.
>
> CC: Lorenzo Bianconi
> Fixes: d7abfe39cfd2 ("OVN: add buffering
On 12.11.2018 14:04, Timothy Redaelli wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Nov 2018 13:34:11 +0300
> Ilya Maximets wrote:
>
>> This fixes travis distcheck:
>>
>> ERROR: files left in build directory after distclean:
>> ./ipsec/ovs-monitor-ipsec
>> make[1]: *** [distcleancheck] Error 1
>>
>> CC: Timothy
Buffered packets are always packets created by 'dp_packet_clone_data()'
i.e. they are malloced. It's not enough to free the packet data,
dp_packet structure must be freed too. 'dp_packet_delete()' will take
care of that.
CC: Lorenzo Bianconi
Fixes: d7abfe39cfd2 ("OVN: add buffering support for
'destroy_buffered_packets()' removes the hmap node which was
already removed by 'HMAP_FOR_EACH_POP()' producing following
crash log:
Invalid read of size 8
at 0x134EDB: hmap_remove (hmap.h:287)
by 0x134EDB: destroy_buffered_packets (pinctrl.c:237)
by 0x13AB3B:
On 12.11.2018 12:26, Eelco Chaudron wrote:
> When the netdev link flags are changed, !NETDEV_UP, the DPDK ports are not
> actually going down. This is causing problems for people trying to bring
> down a bond member. The bond link is no longer being used to receive or
> transmit traffic,
On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 04:26:22AM -0500, Eelco Chaudron wrote:
> When the netdev link flags are changed, !NETDEV_UP, the DPDK ports are not
> actually going down. This is causing problems for people trying to bring
> down a bond member. The bond link is no longer being used to receive or
>
* Dropped 'is_all_zero' function, which is equal to 'is_all_zeros'
from util.h .
* util.h added to includes. Includes re-sorted within their blocks.
(it's hard to figure out where to put new one if there is no order.)
Note: linux/if.h depends on sys/socket.h .
* 'ovs_u128_is_zero' used
On 9 Nov 2018, at 17:19, Flavio Leitner wrote:
On Fri, Nov 09, 2018 at 07:24:55AM -0500, Eelco Chaudron wrote:
When the netdev link flags are changed, !NETDEV_UP, the DPDK ports
are not
actually going down. This is causing problems for people trying to
bring
down a bond member. The bond
When the netdev link flags are changed, !NETDEV_UP, the DPDK ports are not
actually going down. This is causing problems for people trying to bring
down a bond member. The bond link is no longer being used to receive or
transmit traffic, however, the other end keeps sending data as the link
31 matches
Mail list logo
