Re: [ovs-dev] OVS/OVN Split initial commits are complete

On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 11:14 AM Numan Siddique wrote: > > > On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 1:56 AM Ben Pfaff wrote: > >> On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 12:51:29PM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote: >> > On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 08:38:06AM -0400, Mark Michelson wrote: >> > > Yesterday, I once again performed the task of

Re: [ovs-dev] OVS/OVN Split initial commits are complete

On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 1:56 AM Ben Pfaff wrote: > On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 12:51:29PM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 08:38:06AM -0400, Mark Michelson wrote: > > > Yesterday, I once again performed the task of splitting OVN from OVS > (I've > > > gotten pretty good at it

[ovs-dev] testez l'hypnose

Et si l'Hypnose était votre solution ?TABAC - MINCEUR - STRESS - CONFIANCE ...Fichiers AUDIO MP3 à écouter chez vous, sur votre smartphone ... CLIQUEZ ICI Je souhaite me desinscrire, cliquez ici ___ dev mailing list

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH v4 1/2] OVN: Enable E-W Traffic, Vlan backed DVR

Hi Numan, Glad to see your review comments. Sorry, I missed your feedback on flat networks earlier. a. The idea behind network_type is just to indicate if packets will be encapsulated or not. b. Having type as “vlan” is a way of saying that packets will be tagged if there is a native vlan

Re: [ovs-dev] [ovs-dev, PATCHv6] netdev-afxdp: add new netdev type for AF_XDP.

Hi Ilya, Very appreciated for your review! I will fix/address your comments in my next version. see replies inline On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 8:09 AM Ilya Maximets wrote: > Hi. > > This is not a full review. Just a bunch of thoughts. > > See inline. > > Best regards, Ilya Maximets. > > On

Re: [ovs-dev] OVN: Fix failures after OVS/OVN split

Bleep bloop. Greetings Brian Haley, I am a robot and I have tried out your patch. Thanks for your contribution. I encountered some error that I wasn't expecting. See the details below. git-am: fatal: sha1 information is lacking or useless (Makefile.am). Repository lacks necessary blobs to

[ovs-dev] (no subject)

Hi Dear, i am Marcelina Origin from Sudan, contact back with my email i will tell you more details about myself and my photo, my email is; marcelinam...@gmail.com ___ dev mailing list d...@openvswitch.org

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH] OVN: Fix failures after OVS/OVN split

On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 04:33:03PM -0400, Brian Haley wrote: > On 4/25/19 4:26 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 04:08:15PM -0400, Brian Haley wrote: > > > Added TODO_SPLIT.rst to Makefile.am to avoid an error > > > during build. > > > > > > Removed a section from config-h-check

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH] ovn-northd: Fix the HA_Chassis sync issue in OVN SB DB

On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 12:31:39AM +0530, nusid...@redhat.com wrote: > From: Numan Siddique > > ovn-northd deletes and recreates HA_Chassis rows (which belong > to a HA_Chassis_Group) whenever the HA_Chassis_Group/Gateway_Chassis > rows in Northbound DB are out of sync. If a Chassis table row in

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH] OVN: Fix failures after OVS/OVN split

On 4/25/19 4:26 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote: On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 04:08:15PM -0400, Brian Haley wrote: Added TODO_SPLIT.rst to Makefile.am to avoid an error during build. Removed a section from config-h-check section of Makefile.am that was no longer relevant. Signed-off-by: Brian Haley ---

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH] OVN: Fix failures after OVS/OVN split

On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 04:08:15PM -0400, Brian Haley wrote: > Added TODO_SPLIT.rst to Makefile.am to avoid an error > during build. > > Removed a section from config-h-check section of Makefile.am > that was no longer relevant. > > Signed-off-by: Brian Haley > --- > Makefile.am | 8 +--- >

Re: [ovs-dev] OVS/OVN Split initial commits are complete

On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 12:51:29PM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote: > On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 08:38:06AM -0400, Mark Michelson wrote: > > Yesterday, I once again performed the task of splitting OVN from OVS (I've > > gotten pretty good at it now). This time, rather than living in a personal > > repo, you

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH] ovsdb-server.7: Describe message ordering between "update" and "transact".

On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 10:51:09AM -0700, Han Zhou wrote: > On Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 5:27 PM Ben Pfaff wrote: > > > > On Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 12:32:04PM -0700, Han Zhou wrote: > > > On Mon, Apr 22, 2019 at 2:00 PM Ben Pfaff wrote: > > > > > > > > This comes up sometime and it's best to document

[ovs-dev] [PATCH] OVN: Fix failures after OVS/OVN split

Added TODO_SPLIT.rst to Makefile.am to avoid an error during build. Removed a section from config-h-check section of Makefile.am that was no longer relevant. Signed-off-by: Brian Haley --- Makefile.am | 8 +--- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/Makefile.am

Re: [ovs-dev] OVS/OVN Split initial commits are complete

On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 08:38:06AM -0400, Mark Michelson wrote: > Yesterday, I once again performed the task of splitting OVN from OVS (I've > gotten pretty good at it now). This time, rather than living in a personal > repo, you can find the ovn repo at https://github.com/ovn-org/ovn.git I

[ovs-dev] [PATCH] ovn-northd: Fix the HA_Chassis sync issue in OVN SB DB

From: Numan Siddique ovn-northd deletes and recreates HA_Chassis rows (which belong to a HA_Chassis_Group) whenever the HA_Chassis_Group/Gateway_Chassis rows in Northbound DB are out of sync. If a Chassis table row in Southbound DB is deleted and if this row is referenced by HA_Chassis row (in

Re: [ovs-dev] OVS dpdk-latest branch & UNH testing

The question here is basically, should we do periodic merges from master to a feature branch? My take is that this is not usually helpful when the merge would succeed without intervention. I don't know how common it is that this particular merge needs help. Repeated merges between branches that

[ovs-dev] [PATCH v3 3/3] netdev-dpdk: Reset queue number for vhost devices on vm shutdown.

Rather than poll all disabled queues and waste some memory for vms that have been shutdown, we can reconfigure when receiving a destroy connection notification from the vhost library. $ while true; do ovs-appctl dpif-netdev/pmd-rxq-show |awk ' /port: / { tot++; if ($5 == "(enabled)")

[ovs-dev] [PATCH v3 2/3] netdev-dpdk: Avoid reconfiguration on VIRTIO_NET_F_MQ changes.

At the moment, a malicious guest might negotiate VIRTIO_NET_F_MQ and !VIRTIO_NET_F_MQ in a loop which would be seen as qp_num going from 1 to n and n to 1 continuously, triggering datapath reconfigurations at each transition. Limit this by only reconfiguring on increased qp_num. The previous

[ovs-dev] [PATCH v3 1/3] dpif-netdev: Only poll enabled vhost queues.

We currently poll all available queues based on the max queue count exchanged with the vhost peer and rely on the vhost library in DPDK to check the vring status beneath. This can lead to some overhead when we have a lot of unused queues. To enhance the situation, we can skip the disabled queues.

Re: [ovs-dev] [ovs-dev, PATCHv6] netdev-afxdp: add new netdev type for AF_XDP.

Hi. This is not a full review. Just a bunch of thoughts. See inline. Best regards, Ilya Maximets. On 25.04.2019 2:47, William Tu wrote: > The patch introduces experimental AF_XDP support for OVS netdev. > AF_XDP is a new address family working together with eBPF/XDP. > A socket with AF_XDP

[ovs-dev] OVS/OVN Split initial commits are complete

Hi all, Yesterday, I once again performed the task of splitting OVN from OVS (I've gotten pretty good at it now). This time, rather than living in a personal repo, you can find the ovn repo at https://github.com/ovn-org/ovn.git If you clone that repo, you should be able to build everything

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH v2 1/3] dpif-netdev: only poll enabled vhost queues

On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 12:19 PM Ilya Maximets wrote: > > > On 25.04.2019 13:03, Kevin Traynor wrote: > > On 25/04/2019 10:50, Maxime Coquelin wrote: > >> > >> > >> On 4/19/19 9:58 AM, Ilya Maximets wrote: > >>> On 18.04.2019 17:05, David Marchand wrote: > > > On Wed, Apr 17, 2019

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH v2 1/3] dpif-netdev: only poll enabled vhost queues

On 4/25/19 12:19 PM, Ilya Maximets wrote: On 25.04.2019 13:03, Kevin Traynor wrote: On 25/04/2019 10:50, Maxime Coquelin wrote: On 4/19/19 9:58 AM, Ilya Maximets wrote: On 18.04.2019 17:05, David Marchand wrote: On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 4:16 PM Kevin Traynor

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH 1/1] dpdk: Use DPDK 18.11.1 release.

On 4/25/2019 11:09 AM, Ilya Maximets wrote: "On 24.04.2019 20:03, Ian Stokes wrote: Modify travis linux build script to use the latest DPDK stable release 18.11.1. Update docs for latest DPDK stable releases. Signed-off-by: Ian Stokes --- .travis/linux-build.sh | 2 +-

[ovs-dev] OVS dpdk-latest branch & UNH testing

Hi All, At last weeks OVS community call [1] the topic of the UNH DPDK lab testing OVS was raised, specifically the issue of the target branches being used so I wanted to kick off a wider discussion on the ML. Currently the UNH Lab tests target the DPDK master branch and the dpdk-latest

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH v2 1/3] dpif-netdev: only poll enabled vhost queues

On 25.04.2019 13:03, Kevin Traynor wrote: > On 25/04/2019 10:50, Maxime Coquelin wrote: >> >> >> On 4/19/19 9:58 AM, Ilya Maximets wrote: >>> On 18.04.2019 17:05, David Marchand wrote: On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 4:16 PM Kevin Traynor >>> > wrote:

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH 1/1] dpdk: Use DPDK 18.11.1 release.

"On 24.04.2019 20:03, Ian Stokes wrote: > Modify travis linux build script to use the latest > DPDK stable release 18.11.1. Update docs for latest > DPDK stable releases. > > Signed-off-by: Ian Stokes > --- > .travis/linux-build.sh | 2 +- > Documentation/faq/releases.rst

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH v2 1/3] dpif-netdev: only poll enabled vhost queues

On 25/04/2019 10:50, Maxime Coquelin wrote: > > > On 4/19/19 9:58 AM, Ilya Maximets wrote: >> On 18.04.2019 17:05, David Marchand wrote: >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 4:16 PM Kevin Traynor >> > wrote: >>> >>> On 16/04/2019 10:45, David Marchand wrote: >>>

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH v2 1/3] dpif-netdev: only poll enabled vhost queues

On 4/19/19 9:58 AM, Ilya Maximets wrote: On 18.04.2019 17:05, David Marchand wrote: On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 4:16 PM Kevin Traynor mailto:ktray...@redhat.com>> wrote: On 16/04/2019 10:45, David Marchand wrote: > @@ -1171,6 +1173,9 @@ pmd_info_show_rxq(struct ds *reply, struct

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH v4 1/2] OVN: Enable E-W Traffic, Vlan backed DVR

On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 5:46 AM Ankur Sharma wrote: > Background: > [1] > https://mail.openvswitch.org/pipermail/ovs-dev/2018-October/353066.html > [2] > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1uoQH478wM1OZ16HrxzbOUvk5LvFnfNEWbkPT6Zmm9OU/edit?usp=sharing > > This Series: > Layer 3 E-W and Layer 3

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH branch-2.7 1/1] dpdk: Use DPDK 16.11.9 release.

> On 24.04.2019 20:04, Ian Stokes wrote: > > Modify travis linux build script to use the latest DPDK stable release > > 16.11.9. Update docs for latest DPDK stable releases. Note 16.11.9 is > > the final support release for the 16.11 series, no further support > > releases for DPDK 16.11 are

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH] netdev: Dynamic per-port Flow API.

On 25.04.2019 10:38, Ilya Maximets wrote: > On 25.04.2019 0:58, Roni Bar Yanai wrote: >> Hi Ilya, >> >> Please see comment/clarification inline. >> Thanks, >> Roni >> >>> -Original Message- >>> From: Ilya Maximets >>> Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2019 6:12 PM >>> To: Ophir Munk ;

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH] netdev: Dynamic per-port Flow API.

On 25.04.2019 0:58, Roni Bar Yanai wrote: > Hi Ilya, > > Please see comment/clarification inline. > Thanks, > Roni > >> -Original Message- >> From: Ilya Maximets >> Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2019 6:12 PM >> To: Ophir Munk ; ovs-dev@openvswitch.org >> Cc: Ian Stokes ; Flavio Leitner ;

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH] travis: Fix checks skipping by sparse.

On 24.04.2019 23:40, Yi-Hung Wei wrote: > On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 6:00 AM Ilya Maximets wrote: >> >> Recent commit in "sparse" broke checking the OVS sources, because >> 'make' uses '-MD' flag to generate dependencies as a side effect >> within compilation commands, but "sparse" skips all the

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH branch-2.7 1/1] dpdk: Use DPDK 16.11.9 release.

On 24.04.2019 20:04, Ian Stokes wrote: > Modify travis linux build script to use the latest > DPDK stable release 16.11.9. Update docs for latest > DPDK stable releases. Note 16.11.9 is the final support > release for the 16.11 series, no further support releases > for DPDK 16.11 are expected. >