On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 11:36 PM Numan Siddique wrote:
>
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 1:04 AM Han Zhou wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 12:16 PM Numan Siddique
wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 12:37 AM Han Zhou wrote:
On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 11:40
On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 1:25 PM Numan Siddique wrote:
>
> Hi Han,
>
> I am thinking of this approach to solve this problem. I still need to
test it.
> If you have any comments or concerns do let me know.
>
>
> **
> diff --git a/northd/ovn-northd.c
Hi Han,
I am thinking of this approach to solve this problem. I still need to test
it.
If you have any comments or concerns do let me know.
**
diff --git a/northd/ovn-northd.c b/northd/ovn-northd.c
index 9a282..a83b56362 100644
---
On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 6:46 AM Mark Michelson wrote:
>
> On 8/30/19 5:39 AM, Daniel Alvarez Sanchez wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 10:01 PM Mark Michelson
wrote:
> >>
> >> On 8/29/19 2:39 PM, Numan Siddique wrote:
> >>> Hello Everyone,
> >>>
> >>> In one of the OVN deployments, we are
The datatype 'pad' in the function 'reverse_nat_packet()' was incorrectly
declared as 'char' instead of 'uint8_t'. This can affect reverse natting
of icmpX packets with padding > 127 bytes. At the same time, add some
comments regarding 'extract_l3_ipvX' usage in this function. Found by
Hi Ramana,
I'm trying to understand your setup.
On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 4:11 AM Ramana Reddy wrote:
>
> Hi Ben, Justin, Jesse and All,
>
> Hope everyone doing great.
>
> During my work, I create a socket using AF_PACKET with virtio_net_hdr and
> filled all the fields in the virtio_net_hdr
> and
On 8/29/2019 10:44 PM, Justin Pettit wrote:
On Aug 29, 2019, at 6:46 PM, Gregory Rose wrote:
On 8/29/2019 3:25 PM, Justin Pettit wrote:
On Aug 29, 2019, at 10:55 AM, Greg Rose wrote:
diff --git a/datapath/flow.c b/datapath/flow.c
index 083288f..92fc6ac 100644
--- a/datapath/flow.c
+++
Thanks Han. Addressed the minor comment in v10.
On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 10:31 PM Han Zhou wrote:
> Thanks for the update.
>
> On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 6:20 PM wrote:
> >
> > From: Aliasgar Ginwala
> >
> > Add support in ovsdb-tool for migrating clustered dbs to standalone dbs.
> > E.g. usage
From: Aliasgar Ginwala
Add support in ovsdb-tool for migrating clustered dbs to standalone dbs.
E.g. usage to migrate nb/sb db to standalone db from raft:
ovsdb-tool cluster-to-standalone ovnnb_db.db ovnnb_db_cluster.db
Signed-off-by: Aliasgar Ginwala
Acked-by: Han Zhou
---
On 8/30/19 5:39 AM, Daniel Alvarez Sanchez wrote:
On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 10:01 PM Mark Michelson wrote:
On 8/29/19 2:39 PM, Numan Siddique wrote:
Hello Everyone,
In one of the OVN deployments, we are seeing 100% CPU usage by
ovn-controllers all the time.
After investigations we found the
On 28.08.2019 15:58, Sriram Vatala wrote:
> OVS may be unable to transmit packets for multiple reasons and
> today there is a single counter to track packets dropped due to
> any of those reasons. The most common reason is that a VM is
> unable to read packets fast enough causing the vhostuser
Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Bianconi
---
acinclude.m4 | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/acinclude.m4 b/acinclude.m4
index d5552d708..31e4f0b54 100644
--- a/acinclude.m4
+++ b/acinclude.m4
@@ -1212,10 +1212,10 @@ dnl
dnl Check for OVS sources
On 29.08.2019 17:46, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 02:43:21PM +0300, Ilya Maximets wrote:
>> On 14.08.2019 18:47, Michele Baldessari wrote:
>>> In some of our destructive testing of ovn-dbs inside containers managed
>>> by pacemaker we reached a situation where /var/run/openvswitch
Hi All,
Please consider this as a gentle remainder.
Thanks & Regards,
Sriram.
-Original Message-
From: Sriram Vatala
Sent: 28 August 2019 18:29
To: ovs-dev@openvswitch.org; i.maxim...@samsung.com
Cc: b...@ovn.org; ian.sto...@intel.com; Sriram Vatala
Subject: [PATCH v7] Detailed packet
Hi
Found a potential memleak issue when I enable bridge ipfix and transmit
traffic through geneve tunnel.
The kernel is centos7.5 3.10.0-862.9.1.el7.x86_64
memleak show a lot of malloc call-stack :
unreferenced object 0x93f473e64000 (size 512):
comm "softirq", pid 0, jiffies
Hi
I run a basic nic2nic case for compiler branch stripping. The improvement is
around 0.8%.
It is observed that 0.37% branch miss in case of directly call
miniflow_extract__(but it is not inline here) and 0.27% branch miss in case of
enable multi-instance for miniflow_extract.
But downside
On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 10:01 PM Mark Michelson wrote:
>
> On 8/29/19 2:39 PM, Numan Siddique wrote:
> > Hello Everyone,
> >
> > In one of the OVN deployments, we are seeing 100% CPU usage by
> > ovn-controllers all the time.
> >
> > After investigations we found the below
> >
> > -
On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 1:04 AM Han Zhou wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 12:16 PM Numan Siddique
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 12:37 AM Han Zhou wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 11:40 AM Numan Siddique
>>> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > Hello Everyone,
>>> >
>>> > In one
18 matches
Mail list logo
