Compliment to you,
Am so sorry for contacting you through this medium. I was desperate looking
for a reputable company or individual that is ready to work with me before I
contacted you.
We are a group of miners looking for potential, reliable and regular Buyers who
can sign at least six
Dearest One,
Please hear my cry, I am 20 years Natacha Ajeh the only child of my
late parents {Chief. Stephen Ofori & Mrs. Comfort Ajeh. My father is
into cocoa and gold business he died of heart attack, His death has
now made me an orphan and I am exposed to danger. Presently I am
staying in a
Donation 1,000,000 GBP
___
dev mailing list
d...@openvswitch.org
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
Thanks William, replies inline.
-邮件原件-
发件人: William Tu [mailto:u9012...@gmail.com]
发送时间: 2020年3月12日 1:51
收件人: Yi Yang (杨燚)-云服务集团
抄送: yang_y...@163.com; ovs-dev@openvswitch.org
主题: Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH v6] Use TPACKET_V3 to accelerate veth for userspace
datapath
On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at
Similar to using veth across namespaces, this patch creates
tap devices, assigns to namespaces, and allows traffic to
go through different test cases.
Signed-off-by: William Tu
---
tests/automake.mk | 1 +
tests/system-tap.at | 34 ++
This patch enables TSO support for non-DPDK use cases, and
also add check-system-tso testsuite. Before TSO, we have to
disable checksum offload, allowing the kernel to calculate the
TCP/UDP packet checsum. With TSO, we can skip the checksum
validation by enabling checksum offload, and with large
On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 1:22 PM Flavio Leitner wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 02:13:07PM +0100, Ilya Maximets wrote:
> > On 3/11/20 1:37 PM, Flavio Leitner wrote:
> > > On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 01:30:32PM +0100, Ilya Maximets wrote:
> > >> On 3/11/20 1:13 PM, Flavio Leitner wrote:
> > >>> On
On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 02:29:59PM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> Hi Numan. I am trying to properly understand the
> reside-on-redirect-chassis option. I think that it has two effects:
>
> 1. Traffic over the router port is always sent to the gateway chassis.
>
> 2. Traffic to the gateway chassis
Hi Numan. I am trying to properly understand the
reside-on-redirect-chassis option. I think that it has two effects:
1. Traffic over the router port is always sent to the gateway chassis.
2. Traffic to the gateway chassis over the router port is always sent via
localnet rather than a
Hi
would you be interested in *Oracle* Users verified email list?
We provide the Database across North America, EMEA, APAC and Latin America.
*Information Fields – *Name, Title, Email, Company Name, and Company
Details like, Physical Address, Web Address, Revenue Size, Employee Size
and
Add a couple of people who might be interested in this feature.
On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 8:29 AM Toshiaki Makita
wrote:
>
> This patch adds an XDP-based flow cache using the OVS netdev-offload
> flow API provider. When a OVS device with XDP offload enabled,
> packets first are processed in the
GUIDE DE LALTERNANCE
A destination des entreprises
Face la difficult de recruter des candidats suffisamment
qualifis, les responsables RH doivent s’adapter et mettre en place de
nouvelles stratgies : l’alternance est une des solutions dont les
nombreux avantages sont considrer.
TÉLÉCHARGER
On 3/11/2020 12:19 PM, David Ahern via dev wrote:
Hi:
Just updated to top of tree git. I see the updates for building on v5.4
kernel (thanks Greg), but I do not see the v2.11.3 tag in git or the
2.11.3 entry on http://www.openvswitch.org/download/. A few other
release are missing as well from
On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 02:13:07PM +0100, Ilya Maximets wrote:
> On 3/11/20 1:37 PM, Flavio Leitner wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 01:30:32PM +0100, Ilya Maximets wrote:
> >> On 3/11/20 1:13 PM, Flavio Leitner wrote:
> >>> On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 11:47:22AM +0100, Ilya Maximets wrote:
>
Hi:
Just updated to top of tree git. I see the updates for building on v5.4
kernel (thanks Greg), but I do not see the v2.11.3 tag in git or the
2.11.3 entry on http://www.openvswitch.org/download/. A few other
release are missing as well from the list on the left side.
David
On 1/8/20 9:18 AM, Aaron Conole wrote:
> David Ahern writes:
>
>> On 12/16/19 2:42 PM, Aaron Conole wrote:
>>> Can you try the following and see if your scalability issue is
>>> addressed? I think it could be better integrated, but this is a
>>> different quick 'n dirty.
>>
>> your patch
Hi,
We are seeing an issue using userspace datapath with tunnel. (Kernel
datapath works ok).
After creating a flow-based tunnel, the first IP packet sent to that
tunnel is always dropped due to
-> neighbor cache miss for 88.88.88.2 on bridge br-phy, sending ARP request
leads to
Datapath
From: Numan Siddique
The commit [1] added lflows to by pass the service monitor health check
packets from conntrack. But it missed out adding in the ingress pre_acl
and egress pre_acl of logical switch pipeline.
This patch adds these missing lflows. It also enhanced the system lb health
check
On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 10:49 AM Greg Rose wrote:
>
> On many systems the check-kmod and check-kernel test suites have
> many failures due to the lack of feature support in the older
> iproute2 utility packages shipped with those systems. Add a
> note indicating that it might be necessary to
On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 7:42 PM Yi Yang (杨燚)-云服务集团 wrote:
>
> Hi, William
>
> I'll fix some your concerns in next ver, please check other inline replies.
>
> -邮件原件-
> 发件人: dev [mailto:ovs-dev-boun...@openvswitch.org] 代表 William Tu
> 发送时间: 2020年3月11日 3:43
> 收件人: yang_y_yi
> 抄送: ovs-dev
>
On many systems the check-kmod and check-kernel test suites have
many failures due to the lack of feature support in the older
iproute2 utility packages shipped with those systems. Add a
note indicating that it might be necessary to update the iproute2
utility package in order to fix those
On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 6:41 AM Lucas Alvares Gomes
wrote:
>
> Hi Han,
>
> Thank you very much for the feedback, much appreciated!
>
> On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 7:06 AM Han Zhou wrote:
> >
> > Thanks Lucas for working on this! Please see my comments below.
> >
> > On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 1:56 AM
Ilya Maximets writes:
> On 3/11/20 4:13 PM, Aaron Conole wrote:
>> Ilya Maximets writes:
>>
>>> If no cache available for current branch, Travis CI uses cache from
>>> the default (master) branch. This causes build failures on older
>>> OVS branches if cache was cleared because DPDK builds
Avoid to configure multiple identical logical flows in
S_ROUTER_IN_ARP_RESOLVE stage. This can happen adding L2 destination
address info about snat since multiple nat entries will use the same
external_ip
Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Bianconi
---
northd/ovn-northd.c | 36
Following tests has no 'ovn' keyword and always skipped by TravisCI:
204: ovn-ic-nbctl.at:25 ovn-ic-nbctl
205: ovn-ic-sbctl.at:25 ovn-ic-sbctl
217: ovn-ic.at:2ovn-ic -- AZ register
218: ovn-ic.at:30 ovn-ic -- transit switch handling
219: ovn-ic.at:70 ovn-ic -- gateway
On 3/11/20 5:57 AM, Yanqin Wei wrote:
> Hi Ilya,
>
> This patch has been in the review pipeline for some time. It runs stable on
> our internal repo more than two months.
> Could you give us some suggestion about the next action I can take to speed
> up the merge of this patch?
Hi. Sorry for
On 3/11/20 4:13 PM, Aaron Conole wrote:
> Ilya Maximets writes:
>
>> If no cache available for current branch, Travis CI uses cache from
>> the default (master) branch. This causes build failures on older
>> OVS branches if cache was cleared because DPDK builds from master
>> branch are not
Ilya Maximets writes:
> If no cache available for current branch, Travis CI uses cache from
> the default (master) branch. This causes build failures on older
> OVS branches if cache was cleared because DPDK builds from master
> branch are not compatible.
>
> For example, we removed pdump
Up
On 3/8/2020 2:50 PM, Paul Blakey wrote:
> Port range struct is currently union so the last min/max port assignment
> wins, and kernel doesn't receive the range.
>
> Change it to struct type.
>
> Fixes: 2bf6ffb76ac6 ("netdev-offload-tc: Add conntrack nat support")
> Signed-off-by: Paul Blakey
Problem:
In OVS-DPDK, flows with output over a bond interface of type “balance-tcp”
(using a hash on TCP/UDP 5-tuple) get translated by the ofproto layer into
"HASH" and "RECIRC" datapath actions. After recirculation, the packet is
forwarded to the bond member port based on 8-bits of the
v11->v12:
Addressed most of comments from Ilya and Eelco.
https://mail.openvswitch.org/pipermail/ovs-dev/2020-February/367832.html
https://mail.openvswitch.org/pipermail/ovs-dev/2020-February/367842.html
Rebased to OVS master.
v10->v11:
Addressed Ben and Ilya's comments.
Hi Han,
Thank you very much for the feedback, much appreciated!
On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 7:06 AM Han Zhou wrote:
>
> Thanks Lucas for working on this! Please see my comments below.
>
> On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 1:56 AM Lucas Alvares Gomes
> wrote:
> >
> > Thanks for the review Dumitry!
> >
> >
On 3/11/20 1:37 PM, Flavio Leitner wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 01:30:32PM +0100, Ilya Maximets wrote:
>> On 3/11/20 1:13 PM, Flavio Leitner wrote:
>>> On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 11:47:22AM +0100, Ilya Maximets wrote:
On 3/10/20 10:01 PM, Flavio Leitner wrote:
>
> Hi William,
>
On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 01:30:32PM +0100, Ilya Maximets wrote:
> On 3/11/20 1:13 PM, Flavio Leitner wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 11:47:22AM +0100, Ilya Maximets wrote:
> >> On 3/10/20 10:01 PM, Flavio Leitner wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hi William,
> >>>
> >>> Any chance to get the function comments
On 3/11/20 1:13 PM, Flavio Leitner wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 11:47:22AM +0100, Ilya Maximets wrote:
>> On 3/10/20 10:01 PM, Flavio Leitner wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi William,
>>>
>>> Any chance to get the function comments copied to the non-dpdk
>>> versions as well?
>>>
>>> I wonder if we could
On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 11:47:22AM +0100, Ilya Maximets wrote:
> On 3/10/20 10:01 PM, Flavio Leitner wrote:
> >
> > Hi William,
> >
> > Any chance to get the function comments copied to the non-dpdk
> > versions as well?
> >
> > I wonder if we could define DP_PACKET_OL.* defines as it is
> >
On 3/10/20 10:01 PM, Flavio Leitner wrote:
>
> Hi William,
>
> Any chance to get the function comments copied to the non-dpdk
> versions as well?
>
> I wonder if we could define DP_PACKET_OL.* defines as it is
> proposed in this patch if DPDK is not enabled, or define them
> as DPDK defines.
Hi Ilya,
This patch has been in the review pipeline for some time. It runs stable on our
internal repo more than two months.
Could you give us some suggestion about the next action I can take to speed up
the merge of this patch?
Best Regards,
Wei Yanqin
> -Original Message-
> From:
On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 9:08 AM Tao YunXiang
wrote:
>
> "Logical_Router_Policy" and "Forwarding_Group" tables doesn't have
> "external_ids" column. I think it is better to add it, so CMS could
> fill it with useful information.
>
>
>
> Author: Tao YunXiang
> Co-authored-by: Liu Chang
>
On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 2:43 AM Ihar Hrachyshka wrote:
>
> These days Automake uses _build/sub for its distcheck builds, not
> plain _build. (I don't know whether that is a change from previous
> versions.)
>
> Adopted from https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1164305/
>
Thanks Lucas for working on this! Please see my comments below.
On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 1:56 AM Lucas Alvares Gomes
wrote:
>
> Thanks for the review Dumitry!
>
> On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 9:19 AM Dumitru Ceara wrote:
> >
> > On 2/19/20 4:37 PM, lmart...@redhat.com wrote:
> > > From: Lucas Alvares
41 matches
Mail list logo
