On 6/8/22 8:58 AM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> IMO to encourage use of the track-capable API we could keep their names
> short and call the legacy functions __netdev_hold() as I mentioned or
> maybe netdev_hold_notrack().
I like that option. Similar to the old nla_parse functions that were
renamed
On 9/20/21 9:34 AM, Antoine Tenart wrote:
> There might be questions about the setup in which a VRF is linked to an
> OVS bridge; I cc'ed Luis Tomás who wrote the article.
My head just exploded. You want to make an L3 device a port of an L2
device.
Can someone explain how this is supposed to
Hi:
Just updated to top of tree git. I see the updates for building on v5.4
kernel (thanks Greg), but I do not see the v2.11.3 tag in git or the
2.11.3 entry on http://www.openvswitch.org/download/. A few other
release are missing as well from the list on the left side.
David
On 1/8/20 9:18 AM, Aaron Conole wrote:
> David Ahern writes:
>
>> On 12/16/19 2:42 PM, Aaron Conole wrote:
>>> Can you try the following and see if your scalability issue is
>>> addressed? I think it could be better integrated, but this is a
>>> dif
;>
>> To be in sync with the upstream kernel, should we use the new upstream
>> netlink parsing APIs (i.e. nla_parse_nested_deprecated(),
>> nla_parse_deprecated_strict(), genlmsg_parse_deprecated()), and
>> backports them to the old APIs if they are not available in the older
>>
On 2/5/20 3:48 PM, Gregory Rose wrote:
>
> I found a way to make this work on the openvswitch out of tree kernel
> module. KCFLAGS
> doesn't work because it is added at the end of the gcc command line and
> we need to
> add a '-include ' directive so that the include file comes
> *before* all
On 12/20/19 11:14 AM, Gregory Rose wrote:
>
> On 12/19/2019 7:20 PM, Gregory Rose wrote:
>>
>> Bisecting is hard when you're doing it across 10s of thousands of
>> Linux revisions but after a few fitsand starts I think it's this
>> patch:
>>
>> commit 9b9a3f20cbe0ba9269cde6fff9f9c69907e150cf
>>
On 12/16/19 2:42 PM, Aaron Conole wrote:
> Can you try the following and see if your scalability issue is
> addressed? I think it could be better integrated, but this is a
> different quick 'n dirty.
your patch reduces the number of threads awakened, but it is still
really high - 43 out of 71
On 12/16/19 2:42 PM, Aaron Conole wrote:
> Can you try the following and see if your scalability issue is
> addressed? I think it could be better integrated, but this is a
> different quick 'n dirty.
I'll to get to it before the end of the week.
___
On 12/13/19 1:52 PM, Aaron Conole wrote:
> Jason Baron via dev writes:
>
>> On 12/10/19 5:20 PM, David Ahern wrote:
>>> On 12/10/19 3:09 PM, Jason Baron wrote:
>>>> Hi David,
>>>>
>>>> The idea is that we try and queue new work to 'idle'
On 12/11/19 12:17 PM, Gregory Rose wrote:
>
> Hi David,
>
> I just want to update you on this work. I've got everything fixed up
> and compiling
> on 5.4.2 but in the modpostsection there are a lot of bizarre errors.
> I'm not sure where
> this comes from so I'm tracking that down.
On 12/10/19 3:09 PM, Jason Baron wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> The idea is that we try and queue new work to 'idle' threads in an
> attempt to distribute a workload. Thus, once we find an 'idle' thread we
> stop waking up other threads. While we are searching the wakeup list for
> idle threads, we do
On 12/10/19 2:20 PM, Matteo Croce wrote:
>
> Before this patch (which unfortunately is needed to avoid -EMFILE
> errors with many ports), how many sockets are awakened when an ARP is
> received?
>
on systems using 2.7.3 I see only a single handler thread awakened on
upcalls.
Yes, I saw the
[ adding Jason as author of the patch that added the epoll exclusive flag ]
On 12/10/19 12:37 PM, Matteo Croce wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 10, 2019 at 8:13 PM David Ahern wrote:
>>
>> Hi Matteo:
>>
>> On a hypervisor running a 4.14.91 kernel and OVS 2.11 I am seeing a
>>
On 12/10/19 12:37 PM, Matteo Croce wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 10, 2019 at 8:13 PM David Ahern wrote:
>>
>> Hi Matteo:
>>
>> On a hypervisor running a 4.14.91 kernel and OVS 2.11 I am seeing a
>> thundering herd wake up problem. Every packet punted to userspace wak
Hi Matteo:
On a hypervisor running a 4.14.91 kernel and OVS 2.11 I am seeing a
thundering herd wake up problem. Every packet punted to userspace wakes
up every one of the handler threads. On a box with 96 cpus, there are 71
handler threads which means 71 process wakeups for every packet punted.
On 12/5/19 5:29 PM, Gregory Rose wrote:
>
> On 12/5/2019 3:22 PM, Gregory Rose wrote:
>>
>> On 12/5/2019 2:15 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>>> On Thu, Dec 05, 2019 at 01:14:54PM -0800, Gregory Rose wrote:
We try to keep our out of tree kernel modules compiling against recent
kernels and will
On 12/5/19 2:14 PM, Gregory Rose wrote:
>
> We try to keep our out of tree kernel modules compiling against recent
> kernels and
> will eventually add support for 5.4. Right now our support is up to
> 5.0. However,
> you can just build the user space code and not bother with building the
> out
Hi:
I am trying to compile ovs code from github for the 5.4 kernel and the
module builds are failing (excerpt pasted below). Is anyone working on
moving the out of tree modules forward to 5.4 now that it is released
and targeted as an LTS?
Thanks,
David
fier.
>
> Signed-off-by: Petr Machata
> Acked-by: Jiri Pirko
> Reviewed-by: Ido Schimmel
> ---
> net/core/dev.c | 8
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
Reviewed-by: David Ahern
___
dev mailing list
d..
that passes NULL for extack.
>
> Signed-off-by: Petr Machata
> Acked-by: Jiri Pirko
> Reviewed-by: Ido Schimmel
> ---
> net/core/dev.c | 21 -
> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
Reviewed-by: David Ahern
_
geneve.c| 2 +-
> net/openvswitch/vport-gre.c | 2 +-
> net/openvswitch/vport-vxlan.c | 2 +-
> 15 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
>
Reviewed-by: David Ahern
___
dev mailing list
d...@openvswitch.org
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
y: Ido Schimmel
> ---
> include/linux/netdevice.h | 3 ++-
> net/core/dev.c| 5 +++--
> net/core/rtnetlink.c | 3 ++-
> 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
Reviewed-by: David Ahern
___
dev mailing list
mel
> ---
> drivers/net/vrf.c | 7 ---
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
Reviewed-by: David Ahern
___
dev mailing list
d...@openvswitch.org
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
| 2 +-
> net/core/dev.c | 5 +++--
> net/core/netpoll.c | 2 +-
> net/ipv4/ipmr.c | 4 ++--
> net/ipv6/addrconf.c | 2 +-
> net/ipv6/ip6mr.c
On 4/16/17 8:40 AM, Jamal Hadi Salim wrote:
>
> Johannes or anybody else working on it?
> i.e one which sends the extack to the bowels of callees
> so we can return meaningful messages
> example: rtnetlink::doit() or equivalent seems to be a candidate for
> taking it as a param
> For things that
On 4/16/17 8:48 AM, Jamal Hadi Salim wrote:
> Excellent. His patches seem to be in. Seems
> commit ce07183282975026716107d36fd3f5f93de76668
> is a good point?
yes. will send later today.
___
dev mailing list
d...@openvswitch.org
On 4/16/17 8:40 AM, Jamal Hadi Salim wrote:
>
> Johannes or anybody else working on it?
> i.e one which sends the extack to the bowels of callees
> so we can return meaningful messages
> example: rtnetlink::doit() or equivalent seems to be a candidate for
> taking it as a param
I have a patch
28 matches
Mail list logo
